Under Florida\u27s new control-share acquisition law, a shareholder\u27s right to vote will be determined in certain circumstances by a vote of the other shareholders. Merrs. [sic] Rasmussen and Fuller contend that the commerce clause precludes the law\u27s interference with interstate commerce, that the law might be preempted by the Williams Act, and that the law\u27s validity is questionable on other constitutional grounds. The authors also suggest answers to the may questions they raise regarding ambiguities in the law, and offer advice for both potential targets and stock acquirers on how to comply with the law
The author traces and analyzes some of the more important judicial and legislative developments in t...
This Article reveals two very different lessons about state competence to regulate corporate takeove...
In a recent article in this journal, Professor Richard Booth offers an extended appraisal of state l...
Under Florida\u27s new control-share acquisition law, a shareholder\u27s right to vote will be deter...
Many states perceive corporate takeover activity as a threat to local business and industry. The Fl...
Effective July 1, 1990, the Florida Legislature revamped Florida\u27s corporate law by enacting the ...
The objective of this article is to inform the reader of what Ohio has done over the past six years ...
Financial and legal scholars have continuously debated over the effects of takeover laws. This essay...
Conventional wisdom holds that corporate takeovers benefit both shareholders and society in general....
The last twenty years have witnessed an explosion of corporate takeovers, mergers and acquisitions. ...
In this Article, Professor John Coffee considers under what circumstances there could be a legitimat...
Corporate Law-CORPORATIONS MAY EXCLUDE RAIDERS FROM DEFENSIVE SELF-TENDER OFFERS IN WARDING OFF HOST...
Recent state takeover regulation has reinvigorated the debate over which level of government, state ...
Part I of this Note describes a phenomenon of modern corporate activity first identified over fifty ...
In this Article, Professor Jonathan Macey argues that current anti-takeover laws waste corporate ass...
The author traces and analyzes some of the more important judicial and legislative developments in t...
This Article reveals two very different lessons about state competence to regulate corporate takeove...
In a recent article in this journal, Professor Richard Booth offers an extended appraisal of state l...
Under Florida\u27s new control-share acquisition law, a shareholder\u27s right to vote will be deter...
Many states perceive corporate takeover activity as a threat to local business and industry. The Fl...
Effective July 1, 1990, the Florida Legislature revamped Florida\u27s corporate law by enacting the ...
The objective of this article is to inform the reader of what Ohio has done over the past six years ...
Financial and legal scholars have continuously debated over the effects of takeover laws. This essay...
Conventional wisdom holds that corporate takeovers benefit both shareholders and society in general....
The last twenty years have witnessed an explosion of corporate takeovers, mergers and acquisitions. ...
In this Article, Professor John Coffee considers under what circumstances there could be a legitimat...
Corporate Law-CORPORATIONS MAY EXCLUDE RAIDERS FROM DEFENSIVE SELF-TENDER OFFERS IN WARDING OFF HOST...
Recent state takeover regulation has reinvigorated the debate over which level of government, state ...
Part I of this Note describes a phenomenon of modern corporate activity first identified over fifty ...
In this Article, Professor Jonathan Macey argues that current anti-takeover laws waste corporate ass...
The author traces and analyzes some of the more important judicial and legislative developments in t...
This Article reveals two very different lessons about state competence to regulate corporate takeove...
In a recent article in this journal, Professor Richard Booth offers an extended appraisal of state l...