Treasury regulations defining the duties of those practicing before the IRS, commonly called Circular 230, are a cornerstone of federal tax practice. Recent judicial decisions, however, raise the genuine possibility that substantial portions of Circular 230 may be invalidated if challenged. This possibility began to be taken seriously as a result of the 2013 opinion in Loving v. IRS, the 2014 affirmation of that judgment, and the government’s decision not to seek en banc or Supreme Court review. The concerns intensified with the July 2014 decision in Ridgely v. Lew. They may intensify further – or be deflated – by pending and future challenges to portions of Circular 230. I and others have written about Loving. Here, I carry the work forw...
The covered opinion regulations set forth in Treasury Department Circular 230 impose a number of str...
In earlier work, I found that more than 40% of Treasury regulations studied are susceptible to legal...
In January, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in yet another tax case raising a question about t...
Treasury regulations defining the duties of those practicing before the IRS, commonly called Circula...
The validity of tax regulations has been challenged by taxpayers almost as long as there have been t...
In this article, the authors revisit their prior article on Circular 230 (see Tax Notes, Apr. 4, 200...
This Article addresses the issue of tax preparer oversight. Currently, anyone may prepare a tax retu...
This short review essay evaluates the Practicing Law Institute\u27s Circular 230 Deskbook by Jonatha...
Positive statutory law – principally the Internal Revenue Coe – is the most important source of tax ...
This Article addresses the issue of tax preparer oversight. Currently, anyone may prepare a tax retu...
In 1996, Congress banned the Treasury Department from enacting retroactive regulations but provided ...
In this article, Drumbl explores return preparer regulation as a policy matter and questions what wo...
Congress expressly authorized taxpayers to bring a private cause of action against the United States...
In this article, we consider whether certain provisions of the Regulatory Package (including regulat...
Analysis of several post-Chevron cases indicates that every major Supreme Court case since 1984 invo...
The covered opinion regulations set forth in Treasury Department Circular 230 impose a number of str...
In earlier work, I found that more than 40% of Treasury regulations studied are susceptible to legal...
In January, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in yet another tax case raising a question about t...
Treasury regulations defining the duties of those practicing before the IRS, commonly called Circula...
The validity of tax regulations has been challenged by taxpayers almost as long as there have been t...
In this article, the authors revisit their prior article on Circular 230 (see Tax Notes, Apr. 4, 200...
This Article addresses the issue of tax preparer oversight. Currently, anyone may prepare a tax retu...
This short review essay evaluates the Practicing Law Institute\u27s Circular 230 Deskbook by Jonatha...
Positive statutory law – principally the Internal Revenue Coe – is the most important source of tax ...
This Article addresses the issue of tax preparer oversight. Currently, anyone may prepare a tax retu...
In 1996, Congress banned the Treasury Department from enacting retroactive regulations but provided ...
In this article, Drumbl explores return preparer regulation as a policy matter and questions what wo...
Congress expressly authorized taxpayers to bring a private cause of action against the United States...
In this article, we consider whether certain provisions of the Regulatory Package (including regulat...
Analysis of several post-Chevron cases indicates that every major Supreme Court case since 1984 invo...
The covered opinion regulations set forth in Treasury Department Circular 230 impose a number of str...
In earlier work, I found that more than 40% of Treasury regulations studied are susceptible to legal...
In January, the Supreme Court will hear arguments in yet another tax case raising a question about t...