Add to ORKGThe Minnesota innovation, Extended Jurisdiction Juvenile Prosecution (EJJ), allowed judges simultaneously to impose a delinquency disposition and an adult criminal sentence, the execution of which the judge stayed pending successful completion of the delinquency sentence. Podkapacz and Feld analyze the implementation of Minnesota\u27s new EJJ blended sentencing law in Hennepin County, the largest metropolitan county in the state
Juvenile waiver, or transfer, laws allow certain young offenders to be removed from juvenile court j...
In 1995, Minnesota created a blended sentencing option for serious, violent juvenile offenders. Unde...
The juvenile court system should be abolished and all juvenile offenders should be integrated into t...
Judicial waiver decisions, which affect the most serious or persistent juvenile offenders, require a...
Waiver legislation in Minnesota, as in most other States, typically requires juvenile court judges t...
DRAWING ON SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS OF JUDICIAL WAIVER ADMINISTRATION IN MI...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
Within the past decade, nearly every state has amended its juvenile code in response to perceived in...
There are two principal mechanisms for transferring juvenile offenders to the adult criminal justice...
In 1995, Minnesota created a blended sentencing option for serious, violent juvenile offenders. Unde...
This article examines the origins, purposes, evolution, and impact of Minnesota\u27s pioneering sent...
There are two principal mechanisms for transferring juvenile offenders to the adult criminal justice...
Rising juvenile crime rates during the 1970s and 1980s spurred state legislatures across the country...
Rising juvenile crime rates over three decades spurred legal mobilizations within many state legisla...
One of the most controversial contemporary criminal policy issues is whether serious or chronic youn...
Juvenile waiver, or transfer, laws allow certain young offenders to be removed from juvenile court j...
In 1995, Minnesota created a blended sentencing option for serious, violent juvenile offenders. Unde...
The juvenile court system should be abolished and all juvenile offenders should be integrated into t...
Judicial waiver decisions, which affect the most serious or persistent juvenile offenders, require a...
Waiver legislation in Minnesota, as in most other States, typically requires juvenile court judges t...
DRAWING ON SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS OF JUDICIAL WAIVER ADMINISTRATION IN MI...
At its inception the juvenile court was characterized by procedural informality and individualized, ...
Within the past decade, nearly every state has amended its juvenile code in response to perceived in...
There are two principal mechanisms for transferring juvenile offenders to the adult criminal justice...
In 1995, Minnesota created a blended sentencing option for serious, violent juvenile offenders. Unde...
This article examines the origins, purposes, evolution, and impact of Minnesota\u27s pioneering sent...
There are two principal mechanisms for transferring juvenile offenders to the adult criminal justice...
Rising juvenile crime rates during the 1970s and 1980s spurred state legislatures across the country...
Rising juvenile crime rates over three decades spurred legal mobilizations within many state legisla...
One of the most controversial contemporary criminal policy issues is whether serious or chronic youn...
Juvenile waiver, or transfer, laws allow certain young offenders to be removed from juvenile court j...
In 1995, Minnesota created a blended sentencing option for serious, violent juvenile offenders. Unde...
The juvenile court system should be abolished and all juvenile offenders should be integrated into t...