Add to ORKGThe federal exclusionary rule is a judicially created safeguard of the right of the American people to be secure against unreasonable searches and seizures, as enunciated in the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. The nature of this study is an examination, through Supreme Court interpretations, of the development and operation of this constitutional safeguard. The analysis of this topic was limited to the decisions profferred by the Supreme Court by virtue of its commanding position at the apex of the American judicial system. Although it would have been possible to consider the multifarious opinions of the state judiciaries regarding the evolving interpretation of this judicially constructed constitutional safeguard, such analysis would...
This Article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...
For over a century, federal courts have, with several exceptions, refused to admit evidence seized i...
This article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...
The application of the Fourth Amendment\u27s Exclusionary Rule has divided the Justices of the Supre...
The application of the Fourth Amendment\u27s Exclusionary Rule has divided the Justices of the Supre...
Most contemporary discussions of the exclusionary rule assume or assert that this rule is not pa...
Few doctrines of constitutional criminal procedure generate as much controversy as the Fourth Amendm...
More than 50 years have passed since the Supreme Court decided the Weeks case, barring the use in fe...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [t...
During the 1975 term the Supreme Court handed down nine opinions which involved the fourth amendment...
The FourthAmendment protects the right of the people—us—against unreasonable searches, seizures, and...
This article takes the position that, although the PATRIOT Act is superficially unrelated to the spe...
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
Part I of this Article will trace the development of the Fourth Amendment\u27s exclusionary rule fro...
This Article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...
For over a century, federal courts have, with several exceptions, refused to admit evidence seized i...
This article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...
The application of the Fourth Amendment\u27s Exclusionary Rule has divided the Justices of the Supre...
The application of the Fourth Amendment\u27s Exclusionary Rule has divided the Justices of the Supre...
Most contemporary discussions of the exclusionary rule assume or assert that this rule is not pa...
Few doctrines of constitutional criminal procedure generate as much controversy as the Fourth Amendm...
More than 50 years have passed since the Supreme Court decided the Weeks case, barring the use in fe...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution states that The right of the people to be se...
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [t...
During the 1975 term the Supreme Court handed down nine opinions which involved the fourth amendment...
The FourthAmendment protects the right of the people—us—against unreasonable searches, seizures, and...
This article takes the position that, although the PATRIOT Act is superficially unrelated to the spe...
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
Part I of this Article will trace the development of the Fourth Amendment\u27s exclusionary rule fro...
This Article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...
For over a century, federal courts have, with several exceptions, refused to admit evidence seized i...
This article addresses the questions left unanswered by the Supreme Court’s recent exclusionary rule...