This article presents an empirical analysis of the impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords. Drawing on a database of judgments from 1994 to 2007, changes in judgment-giving behaviour are identified by charting patterns of agreement and dissent across different categories of case. Voting records are also examined in order to identify whether significant differences exist between individual Law Lords in their approach to human rights cases
This article reviews the institutional and substantive impact that the Human Rights Act has on Engli...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
This article presents an empirical analysis of the impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lo...
This article presents an empirical analysis of the impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lo...
This article examines the impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords. The HRA came into fo...
This article presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the role of third party interv...
This article presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the role of third party interv...
This article explores the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the decision making of the House of...
This article explores the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the decision making of the House of...
Reports on a survey analysing the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on cases heard by the House of...
This article reviews the institutional and substantive impact that the Human Rights Act has on Engli...
This article examines the methodological challenges in evaluating whether, and how, human rights lit...
This article examines the methodological challenges in evaluating whether, and how, human rights lit...
The Human Rights Act 1998 unprecedentedly enabled the senior courts in the United Kingdom to review ...
This article reviews the institutional and substantive impact that the Human Rights Act has on Engli...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
This article presents an empirical analysis of the impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lo...
This article presents an empirical analysis of the impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lo...
This article examines the impact of the Human Rights Act on the House of Lords. The HRA came into fo...
This article presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the role of third party interv...
This article presents the findings of an empirical investigation into the role of third party interv...
This article explores the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the decision making of the House of...
This article explores the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on the decision making of the House of...
Reports on a survey analysing the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998 on cases heard by the House of...
This article reviews the institutional and substantive impact that the Human Rights Act has on Engli...
This article examines the methodological challenges in evaluating whether, and how, human rights lit...
This article examines the methodological challenges in evaluating whether, and how, human rights lit...
The Human Rights Act 1998 unprecedentedly enabled the senior courts in the United Kingdom to review ...
This article reviews the institutional and substantive impact that the Human Rights Act has on Engli...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...