Utah v. Thomas R. Herrera and Mikell Sweezey: Unknown

Geoffrey J. Butler Clerk of the Court Utah Supreme Court 3432 State Capitol Salt Lake City, Utah 84114 Re: State v. Thomas R. Herrera, Case No. 920209 State v. Mikell Sweezev, Case No. 920265 (Consolidated Appeals) Dear Mr. Butler: In filing the State\u27s brief in the above-entitled consolidated appeal, citations to the following case law were inadvertently deleted. Pursuant to rule 24 (j), Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, the State now cites: (1) State v. Patterson, 740 P.2d 944 (Alaska 1987), as supplemental authority for the position in Point 11(C) of Appellee\u27s Brief that other jurisdictions have concluded that restriction of mental illness evidence to the first prong of McNaghten is a constitutional legislative action; (2) Potter v. State. 759 P.2d 903 (Idaho App. 1988), as supplemental authority for the position in Points IV & V of Appellee\u27s Brief that defendants have failed to show that the Utah mental illness scheme is unconstitutional as applied; (3) State v. Rhoades. 809 P.2d 455 (Idaho 1991), as supplemental authority for the position in Points IV & V of Appellee\u27s Brief that defendants have failed to establish the justiciability of certain claims. See also Patterson, 740 P.2d at 949 n.18. H XJMENT UTAH SUPREME C U I ^ T A 1 fc, u BRIEF F U i n n OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL :«£T m*f!2Q2£?L \u278 9« w#\u2