Since its inception in 1980, the summary jury trial has received much attention in the scholarly journals and the courts. Most of the arguments and litigation center around the impact of the summary jury trial on the parties or their lawyers. One issue which has gone almost untouched is the authority of the courts to empanel the advisory jury; the backbone of the entire procedure. In Hume v. M,& C Management,2 the court addressed its authority to require citizens to serve as jurors in this alternative method of dispute resolution
Summary judgment today is what settlement was twenty-five years ago: an increasingly popular and imp...
The standard division of labor at trial is that jurors find facts and judges interpret statutes. But...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Since its inception in 1980, the summary jury trial has received much attention in the scholarly jou...
The American judicial system must necessarily rely on a steady flow of dispositions of cases by sett...
Professor Woodley\u27s article is an excellent overview of the issues relating to Summary Jury Trial...
Since its inception nearly ten years ago, the summary jury trial has received almost unanimous accla...
The summary jury trial has proven to be an effective tool in the fight against the explosion of liti...
My experience with summary jury trials as a settlement device, as well as a poll of my colleagues in...
The discussion below is divided into four parts. Part II is a background section describing the summ...
In 1988, the Michigan Supreme Court added the summary jury trial to its arsenal of settlement device...
With its recent decisions in Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, the Supreme Court may b...
It is probably no exaggeration to state that many cases are won or lost on the jury selection. Every...
With its recent decisions in Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, the Supreme Court may b...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Summary judgment today is what settlement was twenty-five years ago: an increasingly popular and imp...
The standard division of labor at trial is that jurors find facts and judges interpret statutes. But...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Since its inception in 1980, the summary jury trial has received much attention in the scholarly jou...
The American judicial system must necessarily rely on a steady flow of dispositions of cases by sett...
Professor Woodley\u27s article is an excellent overview of the issues relating to Summary Jury Trial...
Since its inception nearly ten years ago, the summary jury trial has received almost unanimous accla...
The summary jury trial has proven to be an effective tool in the fight against the explosion of liti...
My experience with summary jury trials as a settlement device, as well as a poll of my colleagues in...
The discussion below is divided into four parts. Part II is a background section describing the summ...
In 1988, the Michigan Supreme Court added the summary jury trial to its arsenal of settlement device...
With its recent decisions in Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, the Supreme Court may b...
It is probably no exaggeration to state that many cases are won or lost on the jury selection. Every...
With its recent decisions in Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, the Supreme Court may b...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Summary judgment today is what settlement was twenty-five years ago: an increasingly popular and imp...
The standard division of labor at trial is that jurors find facts and judges interpret statutes. But...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio