To examine innovations in legal practice, the University of Missouri Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution and the Journal of Dispute Resolution held a symposium on October 12, 2007, featuring leading practitioners and scholars to analyze innovative models of lawyering, including Collaborative Law and other processes. David Hoffman gave an outstanding keynote address, which was followed by two panels of experts. This issue of the Journal of Dispute Resolution presents papers from that symposium was so productive that we did not have time for presentations from some participants and do not have space for all the papers in this issue of the Journal, so some of the papers will be published in the next issue
I have previously called for greater collaboration among a broad variety of lawyers to address the c...
I address below those areas which I believe deserve some added attention from law schools, based on ...
Our focus in this paper is the impact of these trends on legal education, especially professional le...
This article provides an overview of a symposium sponsored by the University of Missouri Center for ...
This article synthesizes some of the main points of the symposium contributors. They covered a wide ...
In Winter 2011, the Washington University Negotiation and Dispute Resolution Program joined forces w...
One of the primary goals of the Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution (CSDR) at the University ...
After briefly recounting some milestones in the history of legal education, and especially efforts t...
The authors in this volume are in the forefront of innovative teaching, practice, and scholarship in...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In this article, Forrest Mosten and Julie Macfarlane build a new bridge in their 30-year professiona...
This law school symposium on the Twenty-First Century Lawyer reflects a fundamental shift in the foc...
It will no surprise to readers of this Journal that in recent years there has been an enormous incre...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In this paper, I shall first briefly examine some of the most significant changes affecting legal pr...
I have previously called for greater collaboration among a broad variety of lawyers to address the c...
I address below those areas which I believe deserve some added attention from law schools, based on ...
Our focus in this paper is the impact of these trends on legal education, especially professional le...
This article provides an overview of a symposium sponsored by the University of Missouri Center for ...
This article synthesizes some of the main points of the symposium contributors. They covered a wide ...
In Winter 2011, the Washington University Negotiation and Dispute Resolution Program joined forces w...
One of the primary goals of the Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution (CSDR) at the University ...
After briefly recounting some milestones in the history of legal education, and especially efforts t...
The authors in this volume are in the forefront of innovative teaching, practice, and scholarship in...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In this article, Forrest Mosten and Julie Macfarlane build a new bridge in their 30-year professiona...
This law school symposium on the Twenty-First Century Lawyer reflects a fundamental shift in the foc...
It will no surprise to readers of this Journal that in recent years there has been an enormous incre...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In this paper, I shall first briefly examine some of the most significant changes affecting legal pr...
I have previously called for greater collaboration among a broad variety of lawyers to address the c...
I address below those areas which I believe deserve some added attention from law schools, based on ...
Our focus in this paper is the impact of these trends on legal education, especially professional le...