In January and June 2016, Judge Jeremy Fogel, Director of the Federal Judicial Center, sat down with Professor S.I. Strong to discuss a variety of issues ranging from the civil rules amendments and the case management process to judicial education, mediation and the role of the Federal Judicial Center. Judge Fogel also gave his views on what lawyers, academics and the public need to know about the federal judiciary and the task of judging, thereby providing important and unique insights into the judicial process
Most professional responsibility textbooks do not discuss judicial conduct, and not surprisingly, ma...
On February 18, 2004, the Honorable Harry T. Edwards, Chief Judge Emeritus and Circuit Judge, United...
The authors in this volume are in the forefront of innovative teaching, practice, and scholarship in...
In January and June 2016, Judge Jeremy Fogel, Director of the Federal Judicial Center, sat down with...
This article evaluates the connection between judicial education and judges’ needs and preferences. ...
When talking about judicial education, a central question emerges: What is the goal of judicial educ...
First, the Essay considers certain obstacles to research concerning judicial education as a means of...
Canadian judges have maintained a steadfast, long-term commitment to judicial education. Through tea...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
In this article, I present a critique of the emerging global practice of judicial education, which h...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
The thesis of this Article, simply stated, is that judicial education makes sense only against the b...
One of the primary goals of the Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution (CSDR) at the University ...
Since 1993, the Judicial Conference Committee on International Judicial Relations has coordinated ou...
In the following pages, we will briefly delineate the settlement process, enumerate the techniques c...
Most professional responsibility textbooks do not discuss judicial conduct, and not surprisingly, ma...
On February 18, 2004, the Honorable Harry T. Edwards, Chief Judge Emeritus and Circuit Judge, United...
The authors in this volume are in the forefront of innovative teaching, practice, and scholarship in...
In January and June 2016, Judge Jeremy Fogel, Director of the Federal Judicial Center, sat down with...
This article evaluates the connection between judicial education and judges’ needs and preferences. ...
When talking about judicial education, a central question emerges: What is the goal of judicial educ...
First, the Essay considers certain obstacles to research concerning judicial education as a means of...
Canadian judges have maintained a steadfast, long-term commitment to judicial education. Through tea...
Specialized judicial education would help supreme court justices and appellate judges of state judic...
In this article, I present a critique of the emerging global practice of judicial education, which h...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
The thesis of this Article, simply stated, is that judicial education makes sense only against the b...
One of the primary goals of the Center for the Study of Dispute Resolution (CSDR) at the University ...
Since 1993, the Judicial Conference Committee on International Judicial Relations has coordinated ou...
In the following pages, we will briefly delineate the settlement process, enumerate the techniques c...
Most professional responsibility textbooks do not discuss judicial conduct, and not surprisingly, ma...
On February 18, 2004, the Honorable Harry T. Edwards, Chief Judge Emeritus and Circuit Judge, United...
The authors in this volume are in the forefront of innovative teaching, practice, and scholarship in...