Add to ORKGThis paper critiques the foundations of Aragaki\u27s analysis, but also gives credit on the importance of dealing with people as less than fully rational. The critique suggests, again, a deep commonality between DD and ADR and potential improvements to both approaches. True collaboration between these approaches, however, requires some re-theorizing of both, including a reconsideration of rationality itself. This paper will sketch some ways in which this might be achieved and, in particular, how DD theory and research may prove helpful for ADR
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
This paper is a brief introduction for the needs assessment and sustainability of alternative disput...
This paper critiques the foundations of Aragaki\u27s analysis, but also gives credit on the importan...
In the essay that follows, I advocate for greater acceptance of the diversity of belief and practice...
In less than a decade, alternative dispute resolution- ADR-has grown from a bravely-voiced hope to a...
In the eyes of legal scholars, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms often show to poor ad...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In the essay that follows, I advocate for greater acceptance of the diversity of belief and practice...
Within our discussion of scientific models and the processes of dispute resolution,\u27 we suggested...
This Article articulates a set of principles for policymaking about alternative dispute resolution (...
As the processes comprising, alternative, or as we now say, appropriate dispute resolution mature ...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
This paper is a brief introduction for the needs assessment and sustainability of alternative disput...
This paper critiques the foundations of Aragaki\u27s analysis, but also gives credit on the importan...
In the essay that follows, I advocate for greater acceptance of the diversity of belief and practice...
In less than a decade, alternative dispute resolution- ADR-has grown from a bravely-voiced hope to a...
In the eyes of legal scholars, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanisms often show to poor ad...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
In the essay that follows, I advocate for greater acceptance of the diversity of belief and practice...
Within our discussion of scientific models and the processes of dispute resolution,\u27 we suggested...
This Article articulates a set of principles for policymaking about alternative dispute resolution (...
As the processes comprising, alternative, or as we now say, appropriate dispute resolution mature ...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
In the United States, critics often argue that the informal, private nature of ADR is hostile to the...
This paper is a brief introduction for the needs assessment and sustainability of alternative disput...