This Note will argue that notwithstanding any criticism of the court-annexed arbitration procedure, the Colorado Supreme Court is taking a leadership position in upholding and expanding the role for arbitration, by recognizing that this form of alternative dispute resolution is less expensive, saves judicial time, provides for confidentially, and most importantly, provides the parties with a sense of fairness in the outcome
In Sands v. Menard, Inc., the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin upheld an arbitration award reinstating ...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
Over the last twenty-five years, the Supreme Court has relied on party autonomy and the national pol...
Often the scope of arbitration clauses does not include all potential claims. When the provision fai...
In response to rising litigation costs and overburdened court dockets, parties are realizing the opp...
This commentary looks at a Supreme Court case, Imburgia v. DIRECTV, in which the Court faces the que...
Court-annexed arbitration is utilized more extensively today than ever before. It commands widesprea...
This Article argues for stabilizing and preserving arbitration\u27s necessary and valuable vocation ...
This Article first explores the Supreme Court\u27s initially reluctant application of the FAA\u27s c...
Arbitration as a forum for dispute resolution has been a part of the American common law heritage fo...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This Article does not advocate reviving the old hostility toward binding arbitration. Rather, the Co...
The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act is universally touted as favoring ...
The American system of arbitration is constantly evolving. From the first formal arbitration tribun...
In Sands v. Menard, Inc., the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin upheld an arbitration award reinstating ...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
Over the last twenty-five years, the Supreme Court has relied on party autonomy and the national pol...
Often the scope of arbitration clauses does not include all potential claims. When the provision fai...
In response to rising litigation costs and overburdened court dockets, parties are realizing the opp...
This commentary looks at a Supreme Court case, Imburgia v. DIRECTV, in which the Court faces the que...
Court-annexed arbitration is utilized more extensively today than ever before. It commands widesprea...
This Article argues for stabilizing and preserving arbitration\u27s necessary and valuable vocation ...
This Article first explores the Supreme Court\u27s initially reluctant application of the FAA\u27s c...
Arbitration as a forum for dispute resolution has been a part of the American common law heritage fo...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This Article does not advocate reviving the old hostility toward binding arbitration. Rather, the Co...
The Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Federal Arbitration Act is universally touted as favoring ...
The American system of arbitration is constantly evolving. From the first formal arbitration tribun...
In Sands v. Menard, Inc., the Court of Appeals of Wisconsin upheld an arbitration award reinstating ...
Despite talk of a “federalism revival,” state law is quietly losing ground in the U.S. Supreme Court...
Over the last twenty-five years, the Supreme Court has relied on party autonomy and the national pol...