Add to ORKGInsurance companies and physicians increasingly are requiring medical malpractice claims to be settled by arbitration.2 As a result, many patients are being presented with a new choice when they enter their doctor\u27s office: Sign an arbitration agreement or forgo treatment with their physician. In Buraczynski v. Eyring, the physician required the patients to sign an arbitration agreement prior to performing medical services for them? The agreement contained provisions designed to ensure that the patient made an informed decision before consenting to the agreement.4 But what if there were no other doctors available if the patient chose not to sign
The article examines how courts in different jurisdictions have addressed restrictive employment co...
People thinking about contractual arbitration clauses usually envision the resulting disputes as con...
On September 28, 1997, a resident at the Comanche Trail Nursing Center physically attacked his eight...
This Comment advocates against the use of mandatory arbitration clauses in healthcare providers’ pat...
There is perhaps no better indicator of the general perception of crisis in the American medical s...
Although there is minimal empirical data to support many of the conclusions, 4 the purported advanta...
Includes bibliographical references (pages 98-101)Malpractice claims and suits have been increasing ...
There is an interesting exception to businesses’, employers’, and service providers’ seemingly unive...
To combat the explosion of medical malpractice claims, some states have made arbitration a mandatory...
Is it reasonable for a physician to condition treatment upon the patient’s execution of an arbitrati...
Imagine the next time you visit your doctor’s office, the receptionist gives you two papers to sign ...
After briefly describing the federal legal framework fostering the growth of binding arbitration, th...
This article examines some of the cases in which courts have enforced arbitration clauses in persona...
Scholars have argued that the malpractice system would be better off if patients had the option of w...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
The article examines how courts in different jurisdictions have addressed restrictive employment co...
People thinking about contractual arbitration clauses usually envision the resulting disputes as con...
On September 28, 1997, a resident at the Comanche Trail Nursing Center physically attacked his eight...
This Comment advocates against the use of mandatory arbitration clauses in healthcare providers’ pat...
There is perhaps no better indicator of the general perception of crisis in the American medical s...
Although there is minimal empirical data to support many of the conclusions, 4 the purported advanta...
Includes bibliographical references (pages 98-101)Malpractice claims and suits have been increasing ...
There is an interesting exception to businesses’, employers’, and service providers’ seemingly unive...
To combat the explosion of medical malpractice claims, some states have made arbitration a mandatory...
Is it reasonable for a physician to condition treatment upon the patient’s execution of an arbitrati...
Imagine the next time you visit your doctor’s office, the receptionist gives you two papers to sign ...
After briefly describing the federal legal framework fostering the growth of binding arbitration, th...
This article examines some of the cases in which courts have enforced arbitration clauses in persona...
Scholars have argued that the malpractice system would be better off if patients had the option of w...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
The article examines how courts in different jurisdictions have addressed restrictive employment co...
People thinking about contractual arbitration clauses usually envision the resulting disputes as con...
On September 28, 1997, a resident at the Comanche Trail Nursing Center physically attacked his eight...