This article considers the various issues associated with the creation of a system of collective relief in a region that has traditionally been hostile to the provision of large-scale private litigation. In so doing, the discussion focuses on the clash between certain constitutional rights relating to the ability of the plaintiff to choose the time, place and manner of bringing suit and the European Union’s primary form of legislation concerning cross-border procedure, Council Regulation 44/2001 on jurisdiction and on recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments, commonly known as the Brussels I Regulation
The European Commission has proposed to amend (recast) the Brussels I Regulation, which governs juri...
The author examines, through a discussion of the BNFL case, the sort of procedural issues which are ...
This article considers the role of jurisdiction in supporting private claims for the cross-border re...
This article considers the various issues associated with the creation of a system of collective rel...
This article fills a critical gap in the commentary by undertaking a rights-based analysis of the va...
This article is the first to consider the European resolution from a regulatory perspective, using a...
The article discusses an introduction of a regulatory litigation in the European Union (EU) analogou...
Whether with regard to mass torts, civil-rights claims or as a means of private enforcement of antit...
The purpose of this article is to describe the right to collective action in crossborder employment ...
The United States has long embraced the concept of regulatory litigation, whereby individual litigan...
This article advances an argument that private enforcement of European Union (EU) rights has largely...
The European Union has just adopted a set of amendments to the Brussels I Regulation, which governs ...
The present article aims to critically describe and compare how two rather different legal fora*the ...
The present article aims to critically describe and compare how two rather different legal fora – th...
This article examines the legal regulation and enforcement of asymmetric choice of court agreements ...
The European Commission has proposed to amend (recast) the Brussels I Regulation, which governs juri...
The author examines, through a discussion of the BNFL case, the sort of procedural issues which are ...
This article considers the role of jurisdiction in supporting private claims for the cross-border re...
This article considers the various issues associated with the creation of a system of collective rel...
This article fills a critical gap in the commentary by undertaking a rights-based analysis of the va...
This article is the first to consider the European resolution from a regulatory perspective, using a...
The article discusses an introduction of a regulatory litigation in the European Union (EU) analogou...
Whether with regard to mass torts, civil-rights claims or as a means of private enforcement of antit...
The purpose of this article is to describe the right to collective action in crossborder employment ...
The United States has long embraced the concept of regulatory litigation, whereby individual litigan...
This article advances an argument that private enforcement of European Union (EU) rights has largely...
The European Union has just adopted a set of amendments to the Brussels I Regulation, which governs ...
The present article aims to critically describe and compare how two rather different legal fora*the ...
The present article aims to critically describe and compare how two rather different legal fora – th...
This article examines the legal regulation and enforcement of asymmetric choice of court agreements ...
The European Commission has proposed to amend (recast) the Brussels I Regulation, which governs juri...
The author examines, through a discussion of the BNFL case, the sort of procedural issues which are ...
This article considers the role of jurisdiction in supporting private claims for the cross-border re...