Copyright Law Inadequacies in the Case of Digital Sampling: Adding Color to a Grey Area

This study highlights the legal gaps in the current application of copyright law in music sampling cases. This study focuses on Danger Mouse\u27s Grey Album as a case in point. Based on a review of sampling and its history, international and U.S. copyright history, the intricacies of the Copyright Act of 1976 and how it is applied to sampling, and legal professional\u27s postulations, the following research questions structured the investigation. 1. Are the current applications of copyright law appropriate for digital sampling? 2. Is the practice of digital sampling stealing or recycling? 3. Should new legislation be enacted to both provide structure and guidance for artists using digital samples? 4. And, if so, what would be a proper system? The research suggests that the Copyright Act of 1976 is far behind the technology and access of digital sampling equipment. Furthermore, evidence suggests that most samples could clearly fall under the de minimus defense clause or alteration and can rely on the mainstay that such use will not replace the original work\u27s place in the market. After studying digital sampling case law there is a trend of cases pointing towards the severe need for new legislation