Part II discusses the case’s factual and procedural background. Part III provides background on the relevant aspects of federal trademark law governing registration and the constitutional doctrines relevant to the instant decision. Part IV lays out the court’s decision and its reasoning. Finally, Part V critiques the majority’s analysis, particularly its application of the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions. It then argues that, under the legal doctrines relied upon by the majority, section 2(a) of the Lanham Act is constitutional
On September 29, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to revisit a controversial issue surrounding t...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
The territoriality principle, basic to United States trademark law, provides that foreign uses of a ...
Part II discusses the case’s factual and procedural background. Part III provides background on the ...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
As the Lanham Act approaches the age of sixty-five, it is a good time to take stock of its applicati...
The highly anticipated case of Matal v. Tam resulted in the band, The Slants, eventually being able ...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
Section 2 of the Lanham Act, the federal law governing trademarks, lists a number of bars that precl...
As the Lanham Act approaches the age of 65, it is a good time to take stock of its application to, a...
This brief Essay reviews some of the most significant developments in trademark law during the past ...
This article considers the judicial role in developing trademark law. The issue is important because...
In the 2016-2017 term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Matal v. Tam, holding that the Lanham...
Almost all of the commentary concerning the statutory prohibition on registering offensive trademark...
On September 29, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to revisit a controversial issue surrounding t...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
The territoriality principle, basic to United States trademark law, provides that foreign uses of a ...
Part II discusses the case’s factual and procedural background. Part III provides background on the ...
On June 19, 2017, the Supreme Court sent shockwaves through the bedrock of trademark law with its de...
The United States Supreme Court\u27s unanimous ruling in Matal v. Tam is a landmark decision regardi...
As the Lanham Act approaches the age of sixty-five, it is a good time to take stock of its applicati...
The highly anticipated case of Matal v. Tam resulted in the band, The Slants, eventually being able ...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
Section 2 of the Lanham Act, the federal law governing trademarks, lists a number of bars that precl...
As the Lanham Act approaches the age of 65, it is a good time to take stock of its application to, a...
This brief Essay reviews some of the most significant developments in trademark law during the past ...
This article considers the judicial role in developing trademark law. The issue is important because...
In the 2016-2017 term, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Matal v. Tam, holding that the Lanham...
Almost all of the commentary concerning the statutory prohibition on registering offensive trademark...
On September 29, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court decided to revisit a controversial issue surrounding t...
Speech law has silenced trademark. In In re Tam, the Federal Circuit ruled that the First Amendment ...
The territoriality principle, basic to United States trademark law, provides that foreign uses of a ...