Part II will describe the juvenile officer’s unique role in Missouri law, and explain how this role makes Missouri an outlier within the United States. Part III will argue that the juvenile officer’s prosecutorial discretion violates the separation of powers required by the Missouri Constitution and informed by the U.S. Constitution. Part IV will describe the real world harms that flow from this violation, with a particular focus on the harms in child abuse and neglect cases. Part V will outline potential policy solutions to this problem
In the late nineteenth century, the juvenile court system was established in this country to deal wi...
The Missouri Division of Youth Services (DYS) approach to juvenile justice has become a national mod...
The first juvenile courts in this country were created to keep children from being tried and sentenc...
This Article will address several issues raised by Missouri’s unusual juvenile court structure, argu...
Part II of this Article examines some of the most well-known claims about the Missouri Model of juve...
The present method of treatment of neglected and delinquent children by the juvenile court in Missou...
Part II gives a brief background of the facts and circumstances surrounding the Hart decision. Part ...
This article will focus on the constitutional defects of juvenile court adjudications under Ohio juv...
The area of child custody determinations has historically been plagued by the problem of conflicting...
Because of the increase in the number and severity of violent crimes committed by juveniles, public ...
Properly understood, “juvenile justice” encompasses all four primary categories of juvenile court ju...
This book has been split into several sections to allow for faster downloading.Professor Abrams chro...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
This Note reviews the legal landscape of Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process theory promulg...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
In the late nineteenth century, the juvenile court system was established in this country to deal wi...
The Missouri Division of Youth Services (DYS) approach to juvenile justice has become a national mod...
The first juvenile courts in this country were created to keep children from being tried and sentenc...
This Article will address several issues raised by Missouri’s unusual juvenile court structure, argu...
Part II of this Article examines some of the most well-known claims about the Missouri Model of juve...
The present method of treatment of neglected and delinquent children by the juvenile court in Missou...
Part II gives a brief background of the facts and circumstances surrounding the Hart decision. Part ...
This article will focus on the constitutional defects of juvenile court adjudications under Ohio juv...
The area of child custody determinations has historically been plagued by the problem of conflicting...
Because of the increase in the number and severity of violent crimes committed by juveniles, public ...
Properly understood, “juvenile justice” encompasses all four primary categories of juvenile court ju...
This book has been split into several sections to allow for faster downloading.Professor Abrams chro...
Progressive reformers envisioned a therapeutic juvenile court that made individualized treatment dec...
This Note reviews the legal landscape of Fourteenth Amendment substantive due process theory promulg...
In the past decade, the Supreme Court has transformed the constitutional landscape of juvenile crime...
In the late nineteenth century, the juvenile court system was established in this country to deal wi...
The Missouri Division of Youth Services (DYS) approach to juvenile justice has become a national mod...
The first juvenile courts in this country were created to keep children from being tried and sentenc...