In Bland v. Roberts, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was presented with the issue of whether “liking” a page on Facebook is speech protectable by the First Amendment. This Note argues that the court’s holding, that “liking” something on Facebook is not worthy of First Amendment protection, is a disturbing result that endangers one of our most fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution. In Part II, this Note analyzes the facts and holding of Bland v. Roberts. Next, in Part III, this Note describes in detail how Facebook operates and explains the legal background of the first amendment and its interaction with online communication. Part IV examines the court’s rationale in Bland v. Roberts. Lastly,...
Do communications over social networking sites such as Facebook merit Fourth Amendment protection? T...
Congressional hearings have finally called for the right regulation of social media platforms. The...
The goal of this article is to provide guidance to lawyers trying to navigate the morass that is the...
In Bland v. Roberts, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was prese...
As people live out their lives online, what is protected expression and what is criminal speech? Thi...
In Marsh v. Alabama, a Jehovah’s Witness was arrested and convicted of trespassing for proselytizing...
In the United States, there are now two systems to adjudicate disputes about harmful speech. The fir...
As of this past Thursday, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a lower court ruling that prevented ...
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution provides every citizen with the right to free ...
This Note scrutinizes the constitutionality of statutes that ban sex offenders who are no longer und...
(Excerpt) In August 2017, shortly after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, a po...
Social media has revolutionized the way people communicate and created new questions about what is c...
As social media popularity grows, so too does the constitutional conflicts between the First Amendme...
This Essay explains why previous First Amendment precedents that allowed government to require a pri...
This Article examines the judicial reaction by United States courts to viewpoint discrimination chal...
Do communications over social networking sites such as Facebook merit Fourth Amendment protection? T...
Congressional hearings have finally called for the right regulation of social media platforms. The...
The goal of this article is to provide guidance to lawyers trying to navigate the morass that is the...
In Bland v. Roberts, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia was prese...
As people live out their lives online, what is protected expression and what is criminal speech? Thi...
In Marsh v. Alabama, a Jehovah’s Witness was arrested and convicted of trespassing for proselytizing...
In the United States, there are now two systems to adjudicate disputes about harmful speech. The fir...
As of this past Thursday, the Supreme Court temporarily blocked a lower court ruling that prevented ...
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution provides every citizen with the right to free ...
This Note scrutinizes the constitutionality of statutes that ban sex offenders who are no longer und...
(Excerpt) In August 2017, shortly after the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, a po...
Social media has revolutionized the way people communicate and created new questions about what is c...
As social media popularity grows, so too does the constitutional conflicts between the First Amendme...
This Essay explains why previous First Amendment precedents that allowed government to require a pri...
This Article examines the judicial reaction by United States courts to viewpoint discrimination chal...
Do communications over social networking sites such as Facebook merit Fourth Amendment protection? T...
Congressional hearings have finally called for the right regulation of social media platforms. The...
The goal of this article is to provide guidance to lawyers trying to navigate the morass that is the...