Add to ORKGThis Article examines the tests of design defectiveness developed by the courts, particularly in applying the doctrine of Restatement (Second) of Torts § 402A. The Third Restatement\u27s definition of design defectiveness is examined in Part VIII
This Comment examines Washington\u27s application of the design defect consumer expectations test. W...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
The threshold issue in American products liability litigation is whether the product was defective a...
This Article examines the tests of design defectiveness developed by the courts, particularly in app...
This Article has tried to explain and discuss these developments, to evaluate them, to show their re...
Strict liability in tort has occupied the core of modern products liability doctrine ever since Dean...
This Article will consider the problems engendered by imprecise judicial analysis of the notion of d...
The twenty years since the introduction of the concept of strict products Liability have been marked...
The proposed section 2(b) of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability has caused a great...
The authors discuss the practical and legal problems involved in proving a defect in a product liabi...
Design defectiveness is generally defined in terms of a risk-utility balance, the form of liability ...
One of the reasons for the current unhappy state of tort law generally—and of products liability law...
This Comment recommends how the California Supreme Court should handle a situation in which a manufa...
This article concerns an area of the law of strict liability in tort which is now emerging from an e...
In Melia v. Ford Motor Co., the Court. of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was called upon for the thi...
This Comment examines Washington\u27s application of the design defect consumer expectations test. W...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
The threshold issue in American products liability litigation is whether the product was defective a...
This Article examines the tests of design defectiveness developed by the courts, particularly in app...
This Article has tried to explain and discuss these developments, to evaluate them, to show their re...
Strict liability in tort has occupied the core of modern products liability doctrine ever since Dean...
This Article will consider the problems engendered by imprecise judicial analysis of the notion of d...
The twenty years since the introduction of the concept of strict products Liability have been marked...
The proposed section 2(b) of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability has caused a great...
The authors discuss the practical and legal problems involved in proving a defect in a product liabi...
Design defectiveness is generally defined in terms of a risk-utility balance, the form of liability ...
One of the reasons for the current unhappy state of tort law generally—and of products liability law...
This Comment recommends how the California Supreme Court should handle a situation in which a manufa...
This article concerns an area of the law of strict liability in tort which is now emerging from an e...
In Melia v. Ford Motor Co., the Court. of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit was called upon for the thi...
This Comment examines Washington\u27s application of the design defect consumer expectations test. W...
In the products liability area the pendulum has now swung back to the imposition of strict liability...
The threshold issue in American products liability litigation is whether the product was defective a...