This note examines the decision in Norman v. Wright in light of Sections 538.230 and 537.060 of the Missouri Revised Statutes. The court held that to obtain the credit afforded by Section 537.060, a defendant must plead the existence of a settlement as an affirmative defense. This holding is contrary to both common sense and, in the case of medical malpractice, to the Missouri Supreme Court\u27s own prior directive
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
In Missouri, to obtain a new trial based on juror misconduct, a two step process must be used. First...
Plaintiffs sued at law to recover damages for breach of a racial restrictive covenant, alleging that...
This note examines the decision in Norman v. Wright in light of Sections 538.230 and 537.060 of the ...
This Note argues that the Watts decision appropriately invalidated the statutory limits on economic ...
In Missouri, there has always been some confusion as to the name of the judgment entered when a part...
Litigants in Missouri have had their rights to a trial by jury expanded following the Missouri Supre...
Plaintiff, a resident of Missouri, entered into an employment contract there with a Missouri paintin...
Missouri has a problem. St. Louis City has become such a haven for plaintiffs to achieve easy victor...
This Comment explains why Missouri\u27s limitation doctrine prevented tolling the limitation period ...
Tort reform has become a prominent and contested issue as legislatures around the country are seekin...
Missouri common law has long held that a constructive trust should be imposed only in cases of fraud...
Few challenges to a judicial determination are as disruptive as a criminal defendant’s allegation of...
Adverse Possession - Tacking - To a suit in ejectment, defendant pleaded, (z) the statute of limitat...
The question of whether continued employment constitutes acceptance and consideration for an employm...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
In Missouri, to obtain a new trial based on juror misconduct, a two step process must be used. First...
Plaintiffs sued at law to recover damages for breach of a racial restrictive covenant, alleging that...
This note examines the decision in Norman v. Wright in light of Sections 538.230 and 537.060 of the ...
This Note argues that the Watts decision appropriately invalidated the statutory limits on economic ...
In Missouri, there has always been some confusion as to the name of the judgment entered when a part...
Litigants in Missouri have had their rights to a trial by jury expanded following the Missouri Supre...
Plaintiff, a resident of Missouri, entered into an employment contract there with a Missouri paintin...
Missouri has a problem. St. Louis City has become such a haven for plaintiffs to achieve easy victor...
This Comment explains why Missouri\u27s limitation doctrine prevented tolling the limitation period ...
Tort reform has become a prominent and contested issue as legislatures around the country are seekin...
Missouri common law has long held that a constructive trust should be imposed only in cases of fraud...
Few challenges to a judicial determination are as disruptive as a criminal defendant’s allegation of...
Adverse Possession - Tacking - To a suit in ejectment, defendant pleaded, (z) the statute of limitat...
The question of whether continued employment constitutes acceptance and consideration for an employm...
In an action on an express contrast, plaintiff sued for $1750, representing the agreed 5 per cent co...
In Missouri, to obtain a new trial based on juror misconduct, a two step process must be used. First...
Plaintiffs sued at law to recover damages for breach of a racial restrictive covenant, alleging that...
Add to ORKG