Challengers of the Child Online Protection Act, a recently enacted federal law prohibiting the posting of materials harmful to children on the Internet, contended that regional community standards should not govern such a broad-based medium. The United States Supreme Court held, however, that the statutory language mandating application of regional community standards in judging Internet content did not run contrary to the First Amendment. This Note supports the continued use of the Miller obscenity test, including its community standards criteria, but endorses the position taken by the concurring Justices that, in the case the Internet, the test should apply national community standards of obscenity, rather that the community standards of ...
This comment explores the constitutionality of federal regulations as applied to Internet content an...
Using an airing of the Victoria Secret fashion show as an example, the author explores the definitio...
The article suggests that the test for obscene speech under the Miller case should be abandoned beca...
Challengers of the Child Online Protection Act, a recently enacted federal law prohibiting the posti...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the Child Online Protection Act\u27s use of commun...
This note concurs with the decision reached by the Third Circuit. The federal obscenity law, which i...
This note examines tensions between the community standards doctrine in First Amendment obscenity la...
The Communications Decency Act, the government\u27s previous attempt to protect minors from online p...
This timely Article examines the ramifications of the Ninth Circuit’s groundbreaking adoption of a n...
This note was written in response to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals\u27 2009 decision in United ...
Litigation and court action have provided little in the way of providing solutions to anyone dealing...
The Supreme Court weighs in for a second time in the more than 5-year-old court battle over whether ...
Several states have enacted statutes to protect minors from harmful or obscene materials disseminate...
Paper presentation on the Supreme Court\u27s outdated case law on obscenity and how it needs to be m...
This comment examines the current state of the law in the area of internet regulation restricting ch...
This comment explores the constitutionality of federal regulations as applied to Internet content an...
Using an airing of the Victoria Secret fashion show as an example, the author explores the definitio...
The article suggests that the test for obscene speech under the Miller case should be abandoned beca...
Challengers of the Child Online Protection Act, a recently enacted federal law prohibiting the posti...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the Child Online Protection Act\u27s use of commun...
This note concurs with the decision reached by the Third Circuit. The federal obscenity law, which i...
This note examines tensions between the community standards doctrine in First Amendment obscenity la...
The Communications Decency Act, the government\u27s previous attempt to protect minors from online p...
This timely Article examines the ramifications of the Ninth Circuit’s groundbreaking adoption of a n...
This note was written in response to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals\u27 2009 decision in United ...
Litigation and court action have provided little in the way of providing solutions to anyone dealing...
The Supreme Court weighs in for a second time in the more than 5-year-old court battle over whether ...
Several states have enacted statutes to protect minors from harmful or obscene materials disseminate...
Paper presentation on the Supreme Court\u27s outdated case law on obscenity and how it needs to be m...
This comment examines the current state of the law in the area of internet regulation restricting ch...
This comment explores the constitutionality of federal regulations as applied to Internet content an...
Using an airing of the Victoria Secret fashion show as an example, the author explores the definitio...
The article suggests that the test for obscene speech under the Miller case should be abandoned beca...