Add to ORKGIn Department of Revenue v. Kurth Ranch, the United States Supreme Court found the enforcement of a Montana statute taxing the possession of illegal drugs violated the Double Jeopardy Clause of the sixth amendment.\u27 Kurth is the third case in what appears to be an increasingly broad interpretation of the clause. This note examines the Court\u27s analysis and questions the necessity of protecting against successive punishments
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
Over the past decade, the government has escalated its war on drugs. Although the war has not de...
The sole issue before the Court is whether the Helena Municipal Court violated Petitioner Kristi Ann...
In Department of Revenue v. Kurth Ranch, the United States Supreme Court found the enforcement of a ...
As the war on drugs continues, states have begun to supplement their prosecutorial arsenal. In addit...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision holding the imposition of a state drug t...
This summary first provides a brief overview of the Fifth Amendment\u27s Double Jeopardy Clause. The...
This Article will attempt to distill from this confusion a meaningful double jeopardy policy, applic...
Over the past several years, the Supreme Court taken a hard look at statutes that impose quasi-crim...
The sole issue before the Court is whether the district court violated Barrows’ constitutional doubl...
Criminal defendants often are charged and convicted of multiple offenses. And often one offense is a...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
The United States Supreme Court held that when relevant conduct is used to increase an accused\u27s ...
(Excerpt) Double jeopardy issues arise regularly in the financial, banking and commodities industrie...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
Over the past decade, the government has escalated its war on drugs. Although the war has not de...
The sole issue before the Court is whether the Helena Municipal Court violated Petitioner Kristi Ann...
In Department of Revenue v. Kurth Ranch, the United States Supreme Court found the enforcement of a ...
As the war on drugs continues, states have begun to supplement their prosecutorial arsenal. In addit...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision holding the imposition of a state drug t...
This summary first provides a brief overview of the Fifth Amendment\u27s Double Jeopardy Clause. The...
This Article will attempt to distill from this confusion a meaningful double jeopardy policy, applic...
Over the past several years, the Supreme Court taken a hard look at statutes that impose quasi-crim...
The sole issue before the Court is whether the district court violated Barrows’ constitutional doubl...
Criminal defendants often are charged and convicted of multiple offenses. And often one offense is a...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
The United States Supreme Court held that when relevant conduct is used to increase an accused\u27s ...
(Excerpt) Double jeopardy issues arise regularly in the financial, banking and commodities industrie...
Every now and then a case ·comes along that tests the fundamental premises of a body of law. United ...
Over the past decade, the government has escalated its war on drugs. Although the war has not de...
The sole issue before the Court is whether the Helena Municipal Court violated Petitioner Kristi Ann...