(Excerpt) Part I of this Note discusses the historical background of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and its contemporary meaning in American case law. Part II examines different approaches to the question of whether the sex offender treatment programs discussed here violate that privilege. Finally, Part III advances theories for determining the constitutionality of these programs, evaluates their merits, and ultimately argues that the McKune plurality\u27s use of the atypical and significant hardship standard is the most functional and durable approach that any court has offered to resolve this troubling, muddled, and constitutionally multifaceted question
HIGHLIGHT: This note examines cases in which a criminal defendant is ordered to admit his or her gui...
(Excerpt) On May 20, 2014, Miguel Gonzalez became eligible for conditional release from prison, havi...
This article explores tensions between law and psychiatry after the California Supreme Court\u27s af...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note discusses the historical background of the Fifth Amendment privilege a...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note discusses the passage and provisions of the New York Sex Offender Mana...
Sex offender laws have spiraled out of control in recent years. Yet, despite the irrationality and p...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that advisory boards should not be prevented from considering juvenile de...
The U.S. Supreme Court last decided the issue of whether post-incarceration sex offender regulations...
Sex offender commitment laws present courts with a difficult choice: either allow creative efforts t...
The sex offender has become an acute problem. Sociologists, psychiatrists, and lawyers sensing the i...
In Illinois, a person deemed a Sexually Violent Person (“SVP”) in a civil trial can be detained inde...
This article addresses a paradigmatic risk-based collateral sanction, the so-called civil confinemen...
This Casenote questions the holding in People v. Hicks, a California Supreme Court decision in Decem...
Sex offender legislation has grown exponentially over the past decade and in conjunction the courts ...
Over the past fifty years the Supreme Court has been repeatedly asked to address the constitutionali...
HIGHLIGHT: This note examines cases in which a criminal defendant is ordered to admit his or her gui...
(Excerpt) On May 20, 2014, Miguel Gonzalez became eligible for conditional release from prison, havi...
This article explores tensions between law and psychiatry after the California Supreme Court\u27s af...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note discusses the historical background of the Fifth Amendment privilege a...
(Excerpt) Part I of this Note discusses the passage and provisions of the New York Sex Offender Mana...
Sex offender laws have spiraled out of control in recent years. Yet, despite the irrationality and p...
(Excerpt) This Note argues that advisory boards should not be prevented from considering juvenile de...
The U.S. Supreme Court last decided the issue of whether post-incarceration sex offender regulations...
Sex offender commitment laws present courts with a difficult choice: either allow creative efforts t...
The sex offender has become an acute problem. Sociologists, psychiatrists, and lawyers sensing the i...
In Illinois, a person deemed a Sexually Violent Person (“SVP”) in a civil trial can be detained inde...
This article addresses a paradigmatic risk-based collateral sanction, the so-called civil confinemen...
This Casenote questions the holding in People v. Hicks, a California Supreme Court decision in Decem...
Sex offender legislation has grown exponentially over the past decade and in conjunction the courts ...
Over the past fifty years the Supreme Court has been repeatedly asked to address the constitutionali...
HIGHLIGHT: This note examines cases in which a criminal defendant is ordered to admit his or her gui...
(Excerpt) On May 20, 2014, Miguel Gonzalez became eligible for conditional release from prison, havi...
This article explores tensions between law and psychiatry after the California Supreme Court\u27s af...