Add to ORKGTHIS ARTICLE COMPARES the approaches of the California Evidence Code and the Federal Rules of Evidence to judicial notice. It is part of a study commissioned by the California Law Revision Commission to assess whether the Code should be conformed to the Rules
This Note advocates that federal courts review state criminal convictions in habeas corpus proceedin...
The general problem to be discussed in this comment is the process and supporting reasons used by ap...
Federal and California Evidence Rules, 2018-2019 Supplement: Printed on Facing Pages, with Notes, Co...
THIS ARTICLE COMPARES the general provisions of the California Evidence Code and the Federal Rules o...
On January 1, 1967, the California Evidence Code began to govern trials held in California courts. B...
This article examines the requirements to introduce writings into evidence: authentication, the best...
THE CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE Code ( Code ) and the Federal Rules of Evidence ( Rules ) have much in commo...
This Article examines from a comparative perspective the rules of evidence relating to relevance an...
Evidence admissible in federal courts frequently is excluded under the California exclusionary rule,...
The law of evidence had been codified in three states, California, New Jersey and Kansas, prior to t...
This Article characterizes the history of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence as...
Amends section 13 of Article I, and section 19 of Article VI, of Constitution. Declares in any crimi...
PERMITTING COMMENT ON EVIDENCE AND FAILURE OF DEFENDANT TO TESTIFY IN CRIMINAL CASES. Amends Section...
Article V of the New York Proposed Code of Evidence sets forth the rules of evidentiary privilege. U...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
This Note advocates that federal courts review state criminal convictions in habeas corpus proceedin...
The general problem to be discussed in this comment is the process and supporting reasons used by ap...
Federal and California Evidence Rules, 2018-2019 Supplement: Printed on Facing Pages, with Notes, Co...
THIS ARTICLE COMPARES the general provisions of the California Evidence Code and the Federal Rules o...
On January 1, 1967, the California Evidence Code began to govern trials held in California courts. B...
This article examines the requirements to introduce writings into evidence: authentication, the best...
THE CALIFORNIA EVIDENCE Code ( Code ) and the Federal Rules of Evidence ( Rules ) have much in commo...
This Article examines from a comparative perspective the rules of evidence relating to relevance an...
Evidence admissible in federal courts frequently is excluded under the California exclusionary rule,...
The law of evidence had been codified in three states, California, New Jersey and Kansas, prior to t...
This Article characterizes the history of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence as...
Amends section 13 of Article I, and section 19 of Article VI, of Constitution. Declares in any crimi...
PERMITTING COMMENT ON EVIDENCE AND FAILURE OF DEFENDANT TO TESTIFY IN CRIMINAL CASES. Amends Section...
Article V of the New York Proposed Code of Evidence sets forth the rules of evidentiary privilege. U...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
This Note advocates that federal courts review state criminal convictions in habeas corpus proceedin...
The general problem to be discussed in this comment is the process and supporting reasons used by ap...
Federal and California Evidence Rules, 2018-2019 Supplement: Printed on Facing Pages, with Notes, Co...