PROFESSOR JEAN STERNLIGHT believes that courts should be more reluctant to enforce arbitration agreements than they are to enforce contracts generally. In other words, she believes that contract law\u27s standards of consent are not as high as the standards of consent that should be applied to arbitration agreements. This belief puts her at odds with the Federal Arbitration Act ( FAA ), which requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract, and with the Supreme Court, which continues to recognize that the FAA places arbitration agreements upon the same footing as other contracts
Supreme Court rhetoric about the role of contracts and contract law in arbitration jurisprudence dif...
This symposium was presented in the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Contracts Section of the American Ass...
It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was to place arbitra...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Consenting to a contract containing an arbitration clause or a jury-waiver clause alienates or waive...
The Supreme Court simply stopped talking about the limits of arbitration as a mechanism for the adju...
This Article first explores the Supreme Court\u27s initially reluctant application of the FAA\u27s c...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
People thinking about contractual arbitration clauses usually envision the resulting disputes as con...
Much of what makes civil litigation in the United States materially different from civil litigation ...
Reading a disputed contract is sine qua non for an arbitrator, and a great deal of care must accomp...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This article examines some of the cases in which courts have enforced arbitration clauses in persona...
Having spent much of her academic life battling companies\u27 mandatory imposition of binding arbitr...
Those who favor the current system of virtually unlimited and unreviewable arbitration can forestall...
Supreme Court rhetoric about the role of contracts and contract law in arbitration jurisprudence dif...
This symposium was presented in the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Contracts Section of the American Ass...
It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was to place arbitra...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Consenting to a contract containing an arbitration clause or a jury-waiver clause alienates or waive...
The Supreme Court simply stopped talking about the limits of arbitration as a mechanism for the adju...
This Article first explores the Supreme Court\u27s initially reluctant application of the FAA\u27s c...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
People thinking about contractual arbitration clauses usually envision the resulting disputes as con...
Much of what makes civil litigation in the United States materially different from civil litigation ...
Reading a disputed contract is sine qua non for an arbitrator, and a great deal of care must accomp...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
This article examines some of the cases in which courts have enforced arbitration clauses in persona...
Having spent much of her academic life battling companies\u27 mandatory imposition of binding arbitr...
Those who favor the current system of virtually unlimited and unreviewable arbitration can forestall...
Supreme Court rhetoric about the role of contracts and contract law in arbitration jurisprudence dif...
This symposium was presented in the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Contracts Section of the American Ass...
It is widely acknowledged that the purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) was to place arbitra...