In March 2000, Proposition 21 enacted two revisions to the California Penal Code that dramatically altered the identification and punishment of fringe-offenders. First, a defendant need not be a member to be charged as an active participant in a gang. Second, and most importantly, Proposition 21 enacted a conspiracy law allowing gang participants to be charged as co-conspirators for any crime a fellow gang member commits. Under this newly created conspiracy theory, a juvenile may now be sentenced for a gang-related crime in which he did not participate
In 1998, faced with a gang-violence epidemic, California passed the Street Terrorism Enforcement and...
The statutory remedy for removing an arrest from a person’s record places an undue burden upon a per...
This Comment discusses California\u27s Three Strikes sentencing law as it applies to non-jury trial ...
IN MARCH OF 2000, the voters of California passed Proposition 21, the Gang Violence and Juvenile Cr...
This Comment focuses on how the multiple-punishment prohibition of section 654 applies to the enhanc...
In response to rising gang-related crime, California passed in 1988 the Street Terrorism and Prevent...
Since 1988, the number of California criminal street gangs has increased from 600 to 6,442, an incre...
JUVENILE CRIME. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Increases punishment for gang-related felonies; death penalty fo...
This comment will explore the most significant changes that the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Pre...
This Comment proposes a statute mandating institutional reform of California\u27s juvenile system, a...
California’s Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (Penal Code Sections 186.20 et seq.) wa...
This essay, written in reaction to the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform’s 2018 Symposium...
Illustrating the way in which conceptions of race and crime shape and are shaped by law is Californi...
There were over 1.4 million active gang members in the United States as of 2011—an increase of forty...
This thesis project examines the similarities in structure, initiation processes, af liations, and m...
In 1998, faced with a gang-violence epidemic, California passed the Street Terrorism Enforcement and...
The statutory remedy for removing an arrest from a person’s record places an undue burden upon a per...
This Comment discusses California\u27s Three Strikes sentencing law as it applies to non-jury trial ...
IN MARCH OF 2000, the voters of California passed Proposition 21, the Gang Violence and Juvenile Cr...
This Comment focuses on how the multiple-punishment prohibition of section 654 applies to the enhanc...
In response to rising gang-related crime, California passed in 1988 the Street Terrorism and Prevent...
Since 1988, the number of California criminal street gangs has increased from 600 to 6,442, an incre...
JUVENILE CRIME. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Increases punishment for gang-related felonies; death penalty fo...
This comment will explore the most significant changes that the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Pre...
This Comment proposes a statute mandating institutional reform of California\u27s juvenile system, a...
California’s Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act (Penal Code Sections 186.20 et seq.) wa...
This essay, written in reaction to the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform’s 2018 Symposium...
Illustrating the way in which conceptions of race and crime shape and are shaped by law is Californi...
There were over 1.4 million active gang members in the United States as of 2011—an increase of forty...
This thesis project examines the similarities in structure, initiation processes, af liations, and m...
In 1998, faced with a gang-violence epidemic, California passed the Street Terrorism Enforcement and...
The statutory remedy for removing an arrest from a person’s record places an undue burden upon a per...
This Comment discusses California\u27s Three Strikes sentencing law as it applies to non-jury trial ...