At the heart of Moore v City of East Cleveland is 7 year old John Moore Jr. How would we tell the story of Moore from his perspective, and how might the case have been constructed if his rights and constitutional harms were asserted? The ordinary act of registering John for school was the apparent trigger for efforts to exclude him from school, by mandating his removal from his grandmother’s house, after an earlier effort to deny his entry into school had failed. In this essay I first tell the story of the case from John’s perspective and then construct constitutional claims on his behalf
This article examines the significance of the United States Supreme Court decisions in Meyer v. Nebr...
If children possess moral and political rights against the state, theories about these rights have s...
Despite their ringing declarations about human rights, Meyer and Pierce were both formally decided l...
This Article is divided into three parts. First, I retell the story of Moore from John Jr.’s perspec...
At the heart of Moore v City of East Cleveland is 7 year old John Moore Jr. How would we tell the st...
This Article is divided into three parts. First, I retell the story of Moore from John Jr.’s perspec...
This article was written as a contribution to the Fordham Law Review Symposium entitled Moore Kinshi...
Forty years ago, Mrs. Inez Moore, a widowed black mother and grandmother of little means, secured a ...
Part I of this Article briefly recounts the plurality decision in Moore before analyzing Justice Bre...
Part I of this Article briefly explores the culture wars that have consumed American politics since ...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
Symposium - An Analysis of Mississippi Cases Argued before the United State Supreme Cour
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
Concepts that are useful in other areas of human rights break down in the context of children. Becau...
The law governing children is complex, sometimes appearing almost incoherent. The relatively simple ...
This article examines the significance of the United States Supreme Court decisions in Meyer v. Nebr...
If children possess moral and political rights against the state, theories about these rights have s...
Despite their ringing declarations about human rights, Meyer and Pierce were both formally decided l...
This Article is divided into three parts. First, I retell the story of Moore from John Jr.’s perspec...
At the heart of Moore v City of East Cleveland is 7 year old John Moore Jr. How would we tell the st...
This Article is divided into three parts. First, I retell the story of Moore from John Jr.’s perspec...
This article was written as a contribution to the Fordham Law Review Symposium entitled Moore Kinshi...
Forty years ago, Mrs. Inez Moore, a widowed black mother and grandmother of little means, secured a ...
Part I of this Article briefly recounts the plurality decision in Moore before analyzing Justice Bre...
Part I of this Article briefly explores the culture wars that have consumed American politics since ...
Fifty years ago, the United States Supreme Court in In re Gault held that children have the constitu...
Symposium - An Analysis of Mississippi Cases Argued before the United State Supreme Cour
This Article will suggest that the right of autonomy, which limits state control over children, shou...
Concepts that are useful in other areas of human rights break down in the context of children. Becau...
The law governing children is complex, sometimes appearing almost incoherent. The relatively simple ...
This article examines the significance of the United States Supreme Court decisions in Meyer v. Nebr...
If children possess moral and political rights against the state, theories about these rights have s...
Despite their ringing declarations about human rights, Meyer and Pierce were both formally decided l...