This article analyzes the 1996 amendments to section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code. The authors argue that while section 104(a)(2) was in need of remedy, the remedy chosen is both insupportable from the standpoint of tax policy and problematic in terms of administrability. Part II of the article traces the recent history of the statute’s judicial construction. Part III discusses the provisions of the 1996 amendments. Part IV demonstrates the impact of the 1996 amendments on dignitary torts and highlights policy and interpretational problems associated with the amended provision. The article concludes with a proposal for a better remedy
This Article proposes a conception of the “personal physical injury” exclusion that does not require...
The Internal Revenue Code (the Code ) defines income broadly to include wealth from almost every so...
Since the adoption in 1919 of the Revenue Act of 1918, damages received on account of personal injur...
This article analyzes the 1996 amendments to section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code. The aut...
Getting Physical: Excluding Personal Injury Awards under the New Section 104(a)(2
This article examines Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and the litigation that has cen...
The Internal Revenue Service and the courts have wavered on whether punitive damages are taxable und...
Shortly after the income tax became a permanent part of the federal tax landscape in 1913, Congress ...
Part I of this article traces the evolution in the tax treatment of litigation damages from 1918 thr...
This Note compares recent circuit cases reaching different opinions on whether punitive damages rece...
In the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 Congress decided to limit the exclusion for persona...
In Roemer v. Commissioner, the Ninth Circuit turned to California law to locate the meaning of pers...
This paper will examine the history of damage award taxation beginning with the earliest income tax ...
The author explains that in recent court opinions and commentaries concerning whether punitive damag...
The Internal Revenue Code (Code) sweeps into gross income all income from whatever source derived, ...
This Article proposes a conception of the “personal physical injury” exclusion that does not require...
The Internal Revenue Code (the Code ) defines income broadly to include wealth from almost every so...
Since the adoption in 1919 of the Revenue Act of 1918, damages received on account of personal injur...
This article analyzes the 1996 amendments to section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code. The aut...
Getting Physical: Excluding Personal Injury Awards under the New Section 104(a)(2
This article examines Section 104(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code and the litigation that has cen...
The Internal Revenue Service and the courts have wavered on whether punitive damages are taxable und...
Shortly after the income tax became a permanent part of the federal tax landscape in 1913, Congress ...
Part I of this article traces the evolution in the tax treatment of litigation damages from 1918 thr...
This Note compares recent circuit cases reaching different opinions on whether punitive damages rece...
In the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 Congress decided to limit the exclusion for persona...
In Roemer v. Commissioner, the Ninth Circuit turned to California law to locate the meaning of pers...
This paper will examine the history of damage award taxation beginning with the earliest income tax ...
The author explains that in recent court opinions and commentaries concerning whether punitive damag...
The Internal Revenue Code (Code) sweeps into gross income all income from whatever source derived, ...
This Article proposes a conception of the “personal physical injury” exclusion that does not require...
The Internal Revenue Code (the Code ) defines income broadly to include wealth from almost every so...
Since the adoption in 1919 of the Revenue Act of 1918, damages received on account of personal injur...