Florida Bar Immediate Past President Scott Hawkins’s law review essay publishes this eye-catching fact: “90% of the participating voters do not understand what the term ‘judicial merit retention’ means.” This ignorance sends a troubling message because merit retention of appellate judges has been the law in Florida since 1976 and three supreme court justices and numerous district court judges are on the November general election ballot. Even worse, Florida voters themselves chose this method to hold appellate judges accountable instead of submitting them to periodic popular elections, which was the rule in Florida for most of its history as a state
The ousting of three Iowa Supreme Court Justices has sent shockwaves throughout the country for all ...
Election season is within sight again, and with it come the obligatory attacks on the judiciary. Som...
This article argues that popularly electing judges is incompatible with the three basic elements of ...
Florida Bar Immediate Past President Scott Hawkins’s law review essay publishes this eye-catching fa...
The wisdom of selecting judges on merit was slow to take root in the Sunshine State. It had been adv...
This November, voters will decide whether to retain in office three justices of the Florida Supreme ...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
Scott Hawkins’s Perspective on Judicial Merit Retention in Florida makes a number of important point...
During the twentieth century, judicial reformers attempting to depoliticize the selection of state c...
In the US, state Supreme Court judges are either appointed, elected, or more commonly, are subject t...
Jordan M. Singer reflects on the uncertain future of judicial retention elections, in response to To...
This Article considers methods by which state appellate court judges are selected. It focuses on the...
The judicial-merit selection and retention system for appointing judges to the bench was designed to...
On November 8, 2005, something happened in Pennsylvania that has never happened before: an appellate...
Those who are concerned about judicial independence and accountability in the United States quite ri...
The ousting of three Iowa Supreme Court Justices has sent shockwaves throughout the country for all ...
Election season is within sight again, and with it come the obligatory attacks on the judiciary. Som...
This article argues that popularly electing judges is incompatible with the three basic elements of ...
Florida Bar Immediate Past President Scott Hawkins’s law review essay publishes this eye-catching fa...
The wisdom of selecting judges on merit was slow to take root in the Sunshine State. It had been adv...
This November, voters will decide whether to retain in office three justices of the Florida Supreme ...
In the November 2000 election, the citizens of Florida had the opportunity to switch from the nonpar...
Scott Hawkins’s Perspective on Judicial Merit Retention in Florida makes a number of important point...
During the twentieth century, judicial reformers attempting to depoliticize the selection of state c...
In the US, state Supreme Court judges are either appointed, elected, or more commonly, are subject t...
Jordan M. Singer reflects on the uncertain future of judicial retention elections, in response to To...
This Article considers methods by which state appellate court judges are selected. It focuses on the...
The judicial-merit selection and retention system for appointing judges to the bench was designed to...
On November 8, 2005, something happened in Pennsylvania that has never happened before: an appellate...
Those who are concerned about judicial independence and accountability in the United States quite ri...
The ousting of three Iowa Supreme Court Justices has sent shockwaves throughout the country for all ...
Election season is within sight again, and with it come the obligatory attacks on the judiciary. Som...
This article argues that popularly electing judges is incompatible with the three basic elements of ...