Add to ORKGReports how the Court is hearing Terry v. Ohio along with 3 others cases with stop-and-frisk issues. The Court will explore: How much right does a policeman have to stop and question a suspicious person he has no legal reason to arrest? If a policeman frisks a person he does not have a reason to arrest and finds incriminating evidence, can that evidence be used against the person in court.https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/terryvohio_newspaper/1006/thumbnail.jp
Reason to believe a person may be involved in criminal activity is not necessarily also reason to be...
The Ohio Supreme Court upheld the lower court ruling that Cleveland Police Detective Martin McFadden...
Detective Marty McFadden was happy the Supreme Court upheld the trial court\u27s decision in Terry v...
Reports how the Court is hearing Terry v. Ohio along with 3 others cases with stop-and-frisk issues....
Reports on Louis Stokes argument that upholding Terry\u27s frisking by Detective Martin McFadden wou...
Cleveland Police Chief Michael J. Blackwell says police won\u27t abuse new stop-and-frisk authority ...
Recaps the events of the case and describes how police, prosecutors, and others concerned with risi...
The controversy surrounding the legality of police stop and frisk practices at last has been parti...
The plethora of law review articles and cases on search and seizure demonstrates the confusion and f...
Summarizes the Court\u27s opinion in Terry v Ohio, including quotes from the majority opinion. Also ...
In the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Judge Bernard Friedman drew a distinction between sto...
State v. Henry\u27 is a case involving prosecution for the unlawful possession of narcotic drugs. He...
Describes the October 31, 1963 arrest of John W. Terry, Richard D. Chilton and Carl Katz by Clevelan...
Describes the Supreme Court hearing on Terry v Ohio. Reports the Supreme Court Justices engaged in ...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a policeman is justified in making a search for wea...
Reason to believe a person may be involved in criminal activity is not necessarily also reason to be...
The Ohio Supreme Court upheld the lower court ruling that Cleveland Police Detective Martin McFadden...
Detective Marty McFadden was happy the Supreme Court upheld the trial court\u27s decision in Terry v...
Reports how the Court is hearing Terry v. Ohio along with 3 others cases with stop-and-frisk issues....
Reports on Louis Stokes argument that upholding Terry\u27s frisking by Detective Martin McFadden wou...
Cleveland Police Chief Michael J. Blackwell says police won\u27t abuse new stop-and-frisk authority ...
Recaps the events of the case and describes how police, prosecutors, and others concerned with risi...
The controversy surrounding the legality of police stop and frisk practices at last has been parti...
The plethora of law review articles and cases on search and seizure demonstrates the confusion and f...
Summarizes the Court\u27s opinion in Terry v Ohio, including quotes from the majority opinion. Also ...
In the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, Judge Bernard Friedman drew a distinction between sto...
State v. Henry\u27 is a case involving prosecution for the unlawful possession of narcotic drugs. He...
Describes the October 31, 1963 arrest of John W. Terry, Richard D. Chilton and Carl Katz by Clevelan...
Describes the Supreme Court hearing on Terry v Ohio. Reports the Supreme Court Justices engaged in ...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a policeman is justified in making a search for wea...
Reason to believe a person may be involved in criminal activity is not necessarily also reason to be...
The Ohio Supreme Court upheld the lower court ruling that Cleveland Police Detective Martin McFadden...
Detective Marty McFadden was happy the Supreme Court upheld the trial court\u27s decision in Terry v...