The State of Ohio moves to exclude evidence that it views as clearly irrelevant or inadmissible hearsay. In the first section, the State urges the court to exclude Sam Sheppard’s testimony about his family life subsequent to his imprisonment because the testimony is irrelevant. In the second section of the motion the State asks the court to exclude testimony of witnesses Pauline and Mary Eskins, Judith Zackowski, Dr. David Bing, Dr. Laber, Alan Gore, Cynthia Cooper, Carmen Marino and John Wilson. The third section argues that Sam’s “Mockery of Justice” book, the AMSEC Investigative report, certain broadcast and written presentations, and the wood chip exhibits should all be excluded in whole. In the final section, the state explains how the...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude from trial Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37...
The Estate of Sam Sheppard requests to exclude the testimony of Paula Ernst from the trial. Paula wa...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude the Estate\u27s proposed exhibits 31, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,...
The State of Ohio moves to exclude evidence that it views as clearly irrelevant or inadmissible hear...
The State\u27s motion in limine to exclude audio and videotapes of interviews with Richard Eberling ...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 26, 27, and 110 from trial, which are aud...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 26, 27, and 110 from trial, which are aud...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 26, 27, and 110 from trial, which are aud...
This is the State of Ohio’s request that the court exclude exhibits and testimony that relates to th...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude from trial Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 5, 7 and 100, which include do...
The Estate of Sam Sheppard argues that since the 1954 trial was deemed unconstitutional, the testimo...
In many of the depositions, the witnesses were asked to express an opinion as to the guilt or innoce...
This is the State of Ohio’s request that the court exclude exhibits and testimony that relates to th...
The State of Ohio argues that the 1954 trial testimony should not be excluded from this trial. It cl...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 47,48, 52, and 97 from trial, which are l...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude from trial Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37...
The Estate of Sam Sheppard requests to exclude the testimony of Paula Ernst from the trial. Paula wa...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude the Estate\u27s proposed exhibits 31, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,...
The State of Ohio moves to exclude evidence that it views as clearly irrelevant or inadmissible hear...
The State\u27s motion in limine to exclude audio and videotapes of interviews with Richard Eberling ...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 26, 27, and 110 from trial, which are aud...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 26, 27, and 110 from trial, which are aud...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 26, 27, and 110 from trial, which are aud...
This is the State of Ohio’s request that the court exclude exhibits and testimony that relates to th...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude from trial Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 5, 7 and 100, which include do...
The Estate of Sam Sheppard argues that since the 1954 trial was deemed unconstitutional, the testimo...
In many of the depositions, the witnesses were asked to express an opinion as to the guilt or innoce...
This is the State of Ohio’s request that the court exclude exhibits and testimony that relates to th...
The State of Ohio argues that the 1954 trial testimony should not be excluded from this trial. It cl...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 47,48, 52, and 97 from trial, which are l...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude from trial Plaintiff\u27s Exhibits 28, 29, 30, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37...
The Estate of Sam Sheppard requests to exclude the testimony of Paula Ernst from the trial. Paula wa...
The State of Ohio seeks to exclude the Estate\u27s proposed exhibits 31, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44,...