Add to ORKGJustice does not always mean that a case should be tried. By the same token, justice does not always mean that every case should be settled without trial. One of our difficulties is that too often there is more interest in the expedient settlement of differences between litigants than in a judicial determination of rights according to principles of law
The United States Supreme Court, in Darden v. Wainwright, stated that where the error is forensic in...
The role of courts in mass tort litigation is examined. The courts\u27 interests in such cases, the ...
The civil justice system tolerates inconsistent outcomes in cases brought by similarly situated liti...
Here is often complaint that the decisions of the courts are unjust. Probably such complaints have a...
It would seem a truism to state that the object of courts of justice is to do justice between the pa...
From the introduction: The past few years have seen a great deal of controversy concerning the conti...
Few of the suits that are filed continue to trial, but some plaintiffs and defendants find their int...
By protecting the right to a jury, the state and federal constitutions recognize the fundamental val...
OVER A CENTURY ago, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote, The prophecies of what the courts will do in ...
Discussions regarding diminishing access to justice have centered on the high disputing costs, gradu...
The purpose of this article is to develop a pragmatic analysis of corrective justice that will serve...
If it is true, as we often hear, that we are one of the most litigious societies on earth, it is bec...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
This Article proposes the same basic rule as Westen\u27s to explain the Supreme Court\u27s decisions...
It is sometimes said that tort law provides for the vindication of individual rights — which r...
The United States Supreme Court, in Darden v. Wainwright, stated that where the error is forensic in...
The role of courts in mass tort litigation is examined. The courts\u27 interests in such cases, the ...
The civil justice system tolerates inconsistent outcomes in cases brought by similarly situated liti...
Here is often complaint that the decisions of the courts are unjust. Probably such complaints have a...
It would seem a truism to state that the object of courts of justice is to do justice between the pa...
From the introduction: The past few years have seen a great deal of controversy concerning the conti...
Few of the suits that are filed continue to trial, but some plaintiffs and defendants find their int...
By protecting the right to a jury, the state and federal constitutions recognize the fundamental val...
OVER A CENTURY ago, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote, The prophecies of what the courts will do in ...
Discussions regarding diminishing access to justice have centered on the high disputing costs, gradu...
The purpose of this article is to develop a pragmatic analysis of corrective justice that will serve...
If it is true, as we often hear, that we are one of the most litigious societies on earth, it is bec...
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the ...
This Article proposes the same basic rule as Westen\u27s to explain the Supreme Court\u27s decisions...
It is sometimes said that tort law provides for the vindication of individual rights — which r...
The United States Supreme Court, in Darden v. Wainwright, stated that where the error is forensic in...
The role of courts in mass tort litigation is examined. The courts\u27 interests in such cases, the ...
The civil justice system tolerates inconsistent outcomes in cases brought by similarly situated liti...