Add to ORKGThe fact-specific holding “In denying a hospital\u27s motion for protective order under Md. R. 2-403, trial court erred by ruling that e-mails, letters, and testimony of hospital staff to medical review committee were not protected by medical review committee privilege, as Md. Code Ann., Health Occ. § 1-401(d)(1) was not limited to documents generated by the committee itself.
This Article proposes a solution to the problems associated with the current use of vague standards ...
The practice of confidentiality has continued in an era of increased, voluntary openness about medic...
A medical center department chair has just been notified that a physician in his department, Dr. G,...
Holding that [s]tatutes prohibiting discovery of peer review committee documents only covered the r...
The purpose of this article is to illustrate the inherent problems of blanket peer review confidenti...
Participants in the hospital peer review process enjoy enormous protections under federal and state ...
This appeal involves a pretrial discovery dispute. The sole issue presented is whether the trial cou...
An important problem for medical confidentiality in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was...
This article surveys several recent Pennsylvania court decisions in the area of health care law. The...
This comment lays the foundation to evaluate the sustainability of Amendment 7 post-PSQIA in Part II...
The concept of confidentiality arises from legal recognition given to the expectations of parties in...
This article deals with two special problems in the field of confidentiality and privilege, which ca...
Waiver of the Tatutory Protection of the Confidential Relation of Physician and Patient.--The subjec...
This Note addresses the impact of Florida’s Patients’ Right to Know About Adverse Medical Incidents ...
In response to growing litigation between doctors and hospitals and the recalcitrance of some hospit...
This Article proposes a solution to the problems associated with the current use of vague standards ...
The practice of confidentiality has continued in an era of increased, voluntary openness about medic...
A medical center department chair has just been notified that a physician in his department, Dr. G,...
Holding that [s]tatutes prohibiting discovery of peer review committee documents only covered the r...
The purpose of this article is to illustrate the inherent problems of blanket peer review confidenti...
Participants in the hospital peer review process enjoy enormous protections under federal and state ...
This appeal involves a pretrial discovery dispute. The sole issue presented is whether the trial cou...
An important problem for medical confidentiality in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries was...
This article surveys several recent Pennsylvania court decisions in the area of health care law. The...
This comment lays the foundation to evaluate the sustainability of Amendment 7 post-PSQIA in Part II...
The concept of confidentiality arises from legal recognition given to the expectations of parties in...
This article deals with two special problems in the field of confidentiality and privilege, which ca...
Waiver of the Tatutory Protection of the Confidential Relation of Physician and Patient.--The subjec...
This Note addresses the impact of Florida’s Patients’ Right to Know About Adverse Medical Incidents ...
In response to growing litigation between doctors and hospitals and the recalcitrance of some hospit...
This Article proposes a solution to the problems associated with the current use of vague standards ...
The practice of confidentiality has continued in an era of increased, voluntary openness about medic...
A medical center department chair has just been notified that a physician in his department, Dr. G,...