Add to ORKGIn the majority of states, the Married Women\u27s Acts or Emancipation Acts statutes have no express provision with respect to personal tort actions between spouses. Instead, they provide in general language that married women may sue separately for torts committed against them and that they may sue and be sued as though they were unmarried. In most of these states, however, the courts have held that such statutes do not abrogate the common law rule of spousal immunity
At common law an unmarried woman occupied no special status as far as tort liability was concerned, ...
Where the loss of her husband\u27s consortium is the result of personal injuries caused by the mere ...
When the automobile driven by plaintiff\u27s husband collided with another vehicle, plaintiff\u27s h...
In the majority of states, the Married Women\u27s Acts or Emancipation Acts statutes have no express...
Following an interlocutory divorce decree, and while the parties were living apart from one another,...
In Goode v. Martinis, the Washington Supreme Court held that a wife has a cause of action in tort fo...
The doctrine of interspousal immunity, established at early common law, considers husband and wife l...
Plaintiff sued defendants, including plaintiff\u27s husband, for jointly causing a false charge of a...
One of the interesting developments in the law of community property has been the rule which declare...
Plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for injuries which were intentionally inflicted by he...
Plaintiff, an automobile guest resident in Wisconsin, brought action against the driver for personal...
The Indiana Supreme Court has held that the common law doctrine of interspousal immunity in tort act...
Husband and wife, Wisconsin domiciliaries, were involved in an automobile accident in Illinois. W br...
During the 1967 session of the North Carolina General Assembly, the legislators made a novel excursi...
Legal writers have long maintained that a wife should be allowed to bring an action for loss of cons...
At common law an unmarried woman occupied no special status as far as tort liability was concerned, ...
Where the loss of her husband\u27s consortium is the result of personal injuries caused by the mere ...
When the automobile driven by plaintiff\u27s husband collided with another vehicle, plaintiff\u27s h...
In the majority of states, the Married Women\u27s Acts or Emancipation Acts statutes have no express...
Following an interlocutory divorce decree, and while the parties were living apart from one another,...
In Goode v. Martinis, the Washington Supreme Court held that a wife has a cause of action in tort fo...
The doctrine of interspousal immunity, established at early common law, considers husband and wife l...
Plaintiff sued defendants, including plaintiff\u27s husband, for jointly causing a false charge of a...
One of the interesting developments in the law of community property has been the rule which declare...
Plaintiff brought an action to recover damages for injuries which were intentionally inflicted by he...
Plaintiff, an automobile guest resident in Wisconsin, brought action against the driver for personal...
The Indiana Supreme Court has held that the common law doctrine of interspousal immunity in tort act...
Husband and wife, Wisconsin domiciliaries, were involved in an automobile accident in Illinois. W br...
During the 1967 session of the North Carolina General Assembly, the legislators made a novel excursi...
Legal writers have long maintained that a wife should be allowed to bring an action for loss of cons...
At common law an unmarried woman occupied no special status as far as tort liability was concerned, ...
Where the loss of her husband\u27s consortium is the result of personal injuries caused by the mere ...
When the automobile driven by plaintiff\u27s husband collided with another vehicle, plaintiff\u27s h...