When a husband and wife agree to practice birth control no legal problems are normally created. In England and now in all American jurisdictions the use of contraceptive devices and techniques is perfectly lawful, and only three states impose restrictions on voluntary sterilization. In fact, there is considerable evidence that our society not only permits birth control but considers it highly desirable. However, a different situation is presented when contraception is practiced by one spouse against the will of the other. The offending spouse remains free of criminal liability, but he may be vulnerable to some form of marital legal action by his mate. The purpose of this article is to examine the circumstances under which such marital legal...
Surrogacy remains controversial. Several states ban commercial surrogacy while several other states ...
This paper explores the role of the birth control pill on divorce. To identify its effect, we use a ...
This is a case comment on R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA Crim 971 which held that a lie about fertility wa...
When a husband and wife agree to practice birth control no legal problems are normally created. In E...
With the recent decision in People v. Sorenson, a significant departure in ritualistic thinking in t...
A Connecticut statute prohibits the use of contraceptives to prevent conception. Plaintiff-doctor so...
While recovery of damages for wrongful death was sanctioned in England as early as 1846 and is now a...
Husband consenting to the insemination of his wife is criminally liable for support of child; for pu...
Non-consensual contraceptive sterilisation of people with learning difficulties is inherently contro...
"Although the words "contraceptive sterilization" at first glance appear somewhat pleonastic, the id...
This article calls for setting limits on the number of offspring born from any one individual\u27s g...
Most states now recognize a tort cause of action for wrongful conception, typically resulting from a...
This paper argues that there is an urgent need for the creation and clarification of a legal framewo...
This paper briefly reviews the US case law dealing with the issue of birth control fraud and specula...
Article 36 of the Family Code gives additional grounds to annul a marriage. This article is all abou...
Surrogacy remains controversial. Several states ban commercial surrogacy while several other states ...
This paper explores the role of the birth control pill on divorce. To identify its effect, we use a ...
This is a case comment on R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA Crim 971 which held that a lie about fertility wa...
When a husband and wife agree to practice birth control no legal problems are normally created. In E...
With the recent decision in People v. Sorenson, a significant departure in ritualistic thinking in t...
A Connecticut statute prohibits the use of contraceptives to prevent conception. Plaintiff-doctor so...
While recovery of damages for wrongful death was sanctioned in England as early as 1846 and is now a...
Husband consenting to the insemination of his wife is criminally liable for support of child; for pu...
Non-consensual contraceptive sterilisation of people with learning difficulties is inherently contro...
"Although the words "contraceptive sterilization" at first glance appear somewhat pleonastic, the id...
This article calls for setting limits on the number of offspring born from any one individual\u27s g...
Most states now recognize a tort cause of action for wrongful conception, typically resulting from a...
This paper argues that there is an urgent need for the creation and clarification of a legal framewo...
This paper briefly reviews the US case law dealing with the issue of birth control fraud and specula...
Article 36 of the Family Code gives additional grounds to annul a marriage. This article is all abou...
Surrogacy remains controversial. Several states ban commercial surrogacy while several other states ...
This paper explores the role of the birth control pill on divorce. To identify its effect, we use a ...
This is a case comment on R v Lawrance [2020] EWCA Crim 971 which held that a lie about fertility wa...