Much of our national maritime policy is deep-rooted in the body of American admiralty law. Traditionally, Congress and the courts of admiralty have viewed the merchant seaman as within their protective custody because of the inherent danger of his calling and the unique status of his contract of employment. To encourage shipbuilding and develop the American Merchant Marine, similar protection has been extended to the shipowner by enabling him to limit his financial risks in the event of disaster. Conversely, the concept of punitive damages finds no statutory support in our maritime law and has been so seldom awarded as to make questionable its acceptance
Seaworthiness within the field of the general maritime law, and negligence as applied under the Jone...
Admiralty--Longshoremen\u27s and Harbor Workers\u27 Compensation Act Amendments of 1972--Congress Ab...
ADMIRALTY LAW-CONTRACT OF MARINE INSURANCE WITHIN STATE INSURANCE LAW RATHER THAN FEDERAL ADMIRALTY ...
To appreciate the reach of the Court\u27s decision on punitive damages for unseaworthiness claims, i...
Admiralty--Punitive Damages Awarded under the Jones Act P.B.S. Subpoena of Documents Located in Fore...
It seems repugnant to all law that a shipowner should be held liable under the doctrine of unseawort...
As surely everyone knows, the United States Supreme Court has recently brought the Due Process Claus...
Shipowners are exposed to a variety of risks that are, to a large extent, unique to maritime busines...
This Comment compares Dutra Group v. Batterton and Tabingo v. American Triumph LLC, two significant ...
This Comment compares Dutra Group v. Batterton and Tabingo v. American Triumph LLC, two significant ...
Admiralty Rule of Care and Cure A Limit of Liability - One of the very ancient doctrines of the ge...
This Comment compares Dutra Group v. Batterton and Tabingo v. American Triumph LLC, two significant ...
Admiralty Rule of Care and Cure A Limit of Liability - One of the very ancient doctrines of the ge...
This comment examines Robinson v. Pocahontas, Inc., in which the First Circuit allowed punitive dama...
It is universally recognized that in the past two decades the United States Supreme Court has substa...
Seaworthiness within the field of the general maritime law, and negligence as applied under the Jone...
Admiralty--Longshoremen\u27s and Harbor Workers\u27 Compensation Act Amendments of 1972--Congress Ab...
ADMIRALTY LAW-CONTRACT OF MARINE INSURANCE WITHIN STATE INSURANCE LAW RATHER THAN FEDERAL ADMIRALTY ...
To appreciate the reach of the Court\u27s decision on punitive damages for unseaworthiness claims, i...
Admiralty--Punitive Damages Awarded under the Jones Act P.B.S. Subpoena of Documents Located in Fore...
It seems repugnant to all law that a shipowner should be held liable under the doctrine of unseawort...
As surely everyone knows, the United States Supreme Court has recently brought the Due Process Claus...
Shipowners are exposed to a variety of risks that are, to a large extent, unique to maritime busines...
This Comment compares Dutra Group v. Batterton and Tabingo v. American Triumph LLC, two significant ...
This Comment compares Dutra Group v. Batterton and Tabingo v. American Triumph LLC, two significant ...
Admiralty Rule of Care and Cure A Limit of Liability - One of the very ancient doctrines of the ge...
This Comment compares Dutra Group v. Batterton and Tabingo v. American Triumph LLC, two significant ...
Admiralty Rule of Care and Cure A Limit of Liability - One of the very ancient doctrines of the ge...
This comment examines Robinson v. Pocahontas, Inc., in which the First Circuit allowed punitive dama...
It is universally recognized that in the past two decades the United States Supreme Court has substa...
Seaworthiness within the field of the general maritime law, and negligence as applied under the Jone...
Admiralty--Longshoremen\u27s and Harbor Workers\u27 Compensation Act Amendments of 1972--Congress Ab...
ADMIRALTY LAW-CONTRACT OF MARINE INSURANCE WITHIN STATE INSURANCE LAW RATHER THAN FEDERAL ADMIRALTY ...