What factors have influenced the courts in the development of their current attitude toward hospitals? Are the emerging concepts reasonable, or are they indicia of a pendulum swinging too far in the direction of the patient? What are the consequences for the nurse? These are the questions to which the ensuing treatment of one aspect of tort liability is addressed
Berg v. N. Y. Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled, 1 N. Y. 2d 499, 136 N. E. 2d 523 ...
This Comment examines the significance and development of the doctrine of corporate hospital liabili...
This comment examines the Texas Tort Claims Act with particular focus on the Act\u27s tangible prope...
In recent years, hospitals have undergone changes both in their financial and physical structures. T...
Hospital immunity in negligence and other torts of agents and employees is disappearing steadily. Th...
Liability of Hospitals for the Negligence of their Physicians and Nurses.-This question was recently...
Despite the: great number of tort cases which have arisen between hospitals and their patients, comp...
Public Benefit Activities of a hospital, university or welfare agency have been looked upon with spe...
Since 1957 the courts in most states have moved rapidly toward imposing vicarious liability on a hos...
The focus for this discussion is the hospital as a corporate institution and its liability for injur...
An archaic rule has been modified in Ohio by the Supreme Court decision in Avellone v. St. John\u27s...
Why should a treating physician be held liable for any lack of treatment on the part of the hospital...
This Note will examine the court\u27s rationale in Hannola v City of Lakewood and the previous leadi...
Becker v. City or New York, 2 N.Y. 2d 226, 159 N.Y.S.2d 174 (1957); Bing v. Thunig, 2 N.Y.2d 656, 16...
On July 18, 1956, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down its decision in the case of Avellone v. St. ...
Berg v. N. Y. Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled, 1 N. Y. 2d 499, 136 N. E. 2d 523 ...
This Comment examines the significance and development of the doctrine of corporate hospital liabili...
This comment examines the Texas Tort Claims Act with particular focus on the Act\u27s tangible prope...
In recent years, hospitals have undergone changes both in their financial and physical structures. T...
Hospital immunity in negligence and other torts of agents and employees is disappearing steadily. Th...
Liability of Hospitals for the Negligence of their Physicians and Nurses.-This question was recently...
Despite the: great number of tort cases which have arisen between hospitals and their patients, comp...
Public Benefit Activities of a hospital, university or welfare agency have been looked upon with spe...
Since 1957 the courts in most states have moved rapidly toward imposing vicarious liability on a hos...
The focus for this discussion is the hospital as a corporate institution and its liability for injur...
An archaic rule has been modified in Ohio by the Supreme Court decision in Avellone v. St. John\u27s...
Why should a treating physician be held liable for any lack of treatment on the part of the hospital...
This Note will examine the court\u27s rationale in Hannola v City of Lakewood and the previous leadi...
Becker v. City or New York, 2 N.Y. 2d 226, 159 N.Y.S.2d 174 (1957); Bing v. Thunig, 2 N.Y.2d 656, 16...
On July 18, 1956, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down its decision in the case of Avellone v. St. ...
Berg v. N. Y. Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled, 1 N. Y. 2d 499, 136 N. E. 2d 523 ...
This Comment examines the significance and development of the doctrine of corporate hospital liabili...
This comment examines the Texas Tort Claims Act with particular focus on the Act\u27s tangible prope...
Add to ORKG