Add to ORKGThis article will attempt to summarize the views of Professors Hart and Dworkin and engage in a critical evaluation of their thinking to demonstrate what will be perceived as a disparity between their theories and the way the legal machinery operates today
In this article, I examine Matthew H. Kramer’s recent book H. L. A. Hart（2018） and then discuss some...
The goal of this dissertation is to explore and evaluate Ronald Dworkin\u27s hermeneutical theory of...
The purpose of this thesis is to explore two legal theorists\u27 conceptions of law and adjudication...
This article offers a review of the Hart-Dworkin dispute and a qualified defense of the positivist\u...
H. L. A. Hart\u27s work has dominated much of current jurisprudential discussion. In a recent articl...
The editors have kindly invited Professor Sunstein and me to comment on Ronald Dworkin\u27s article ...
H. L. A. Hart thought that a theory of law can be purely descriptive and called his theory a “descri...
This article was delivered on March 15 & 16, 1979, at the Indiana University School of Law, Blooming...
The following article analyzes the dispute between legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart...
The purpose of this project is to provide a fresh and in-depth analysis of legal jurisprudence throu...
In 2014 we celebrate the 20th anniversary of publishing H.L.A. Hart’s ‘Postscript to The Concept of ...
textIn the postscript to The Concept of Law, H.L. A. Hart describes the on-going debate inspired by ...
In this review essay, Professor Michael Steven Green argues that Dworkin\u27s reputation among his f...
These excellent volumes show both the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary and serious Dworkin s...
H.L.A. Hart has rightly been recognized as the outstanding contemporary figure in Anglo-American jur...
In this article, I examine Matthew H. Kramer’s recent book H. L. A. Hart（2018） and then discuss some...
The goal of this dissertation is to explore and evaluate Ronald Dworkin\u27s hermeneutical theory of...
The purpose of this thesis is to explore two legal theorists\u27 conceptions of law and adjudication...
This article offers a review of the Hart-Dworkin dispute and a qualified defense of the positivist\u...
H. L. A. Hart\u27s work has dominated much of current jurisprudential discussion. In a recent articl...
The editors have kindly invited Professor Sunstein and me to comment on Ronald Dworkin\u27s article ...
H. L. A. Hart thought that a theory of law can be purely descriptive and called his theory a “descri...
This article was delivered on March 15 & 16, 1979, at the Indiana University School of Law, Blooming...
The following article analyzes the dispute between legal philosophers Ronald Dworkin and H.L.A. Hart...
The purpose of this project is to provide a fresh and in-depth analysis of legal jurisprudence throu...
In 2014 we celebrate the 20th anniversary of publishing H.L.A. Hart’s ‘Postscript to The Concept of ...
textIn the postscript to The Concept of Law, H.L. A. Hart describes the on-going debate inspired by ...
In this review essay, Professor Michael Steven Green argues that Dworkin\u27s reputation among his f...
These excellent volumes show both the strengths and weaknesses of contemporary and serious Dworkin s...
H.L.A. Hart has rightly been recognized as the outstanding contemporary figure in Anglo-American jur...
In this article, I examine Matthew H. Kramer’s recent book H. L. A. Hart（2018） and then discuss some...
The goal of this dissertation is to explore and evaluate Ronald Dworkin\u27s hermeneutical theory of...
The purpose of this thesis is to explore two legal theorists\u27 conceptions of law and adjudication...