This note will begin with a review of the history of workers\u27 compensation in Ohio, including the development of the exclusive remedy provision. Next, this note will discuss the types of injuries normally compensated by the Ohio Workers\u27 Compensation Act, followed by an analysis of the Ohio Supreme Court cases and legislation creating an intentional tort exception in Ohio. Finally, this note will critique newly enacted Revised Code section 2745.01, discuss the severe problems associated with an expansive interpretation of the statute, and suggest that continuing legislative reform is needed in this area of law
At the time workers\u27 compensation was conceived, the theory of liability without fault was a new ...
Workmen\u27s compensation has been defined as a system of social legislation providing compensation ...
The current workers’ compensation system shields negligent employers from liability and fails to enc...
The purpose of this comment is to discuss the issues and developments in the intentional tort area. ...
This Note begins with a background of Ohio Supreme Court limitations on the General Assembly\u27s de...
Workers\u27 compensation is a no-fault system of recovery implemented by statute in every state. Ori...
Ohio workers\u27 compensation system has been in a state of emergency for the last two years as labo...
In Part I, this comment traces the evolution of workers\u27 compensation laws in this country with p...
In 1911, workmen\u27s compensation originated in Ohio and it was called the Employer\u27s Liability...
The Workmen\u27s Compensation system, which has been a part of Ohio law since May 31, 1911, represen...
Workmen\u27s compensation acts have been generally interpreted in three ways: first, as the substitu...
When Illinois employees are the victims of intentional torts by supervisors, can they bring common l...
Workmen\u27s compensation in the state of Ohio dates back to 1911 when the Ohio legislature enacted ...
Since the adoption of Section 35 of Article II, Constitution of Ohio, the history of the meaning of ...
To protect employees from being discharged in retaliation for filing a workers\u27 compensation clai...
At the time workers\u27 compensation was conceived, the theory of liability without fault was a new ...
Workmen\u27s compensation has been defined as a system of social legislation providing compensation ...
The current workers’ compensation system shields negligent employers from liability and fails to enc...
The purpose of this comment is to discuss the issues and developments in the intentional tort area. ...
This Note begins with a background of Ohio Supreme Court limitations on the General Assembly\u27s de...
Workers\u27 compensation is a no-fault system of recovery implemented by statute in every state. Ori...
Ohio workers\u27 compensation system has been in a state of emergency for the last two years as labo...
In Part I, this comment traces the evolution of workers\u27 compensation laws in this country with p...
In 1911, workmen\u27s compensation originated in Ohio and it was called the Employer\u27s Liability...
The Workmen\u27s Compensation system, which has been a part of Ohio law since May 31, 1911, represen...
Workmen\u27s compensation acts have been generally interpreted in three ways: first, as the substitu...
When Illinois employees are the victims of intentional torts by supervisors, can they bring common l...
Workmen\u27s compensation in the state of Ohio dates back to 1911 when the Ohio legislature enacted ...
Since the adoption of Section 35 of Article II, Constitution of Ohio, the history of the meaning of ...
To protect employees from being discharged in retaliation for filing a workers\u27 compensation clai...
At the time workers\u27 compensation was conceived, the theory of liability without fault was a new ...
Workmen\u27s compensation has been defined as a system of social legislation providing compensation ...
The current workers’ compensation system shields negligent employers from liability and fails to enc...