Add to ORKGThis Article has a single objective: to dispel the notion that judges are deceptive or deluded about judging. These unwarranted assumptions about judges distort theoretical and empirical debates about judging. Ordinarily the participants in any activity are presumed to possess valuable insights about the nature of that activity. Owing to the assumption that judges are deluded or dishonest, what they say on the subject of judging is often regarded with skepticism, discounted at the outset
How do judges judge? Do they apply law to facts in a mechanical and deliberative way, as the formali...
Perceptions of judges ought to be based on their performance. Yet, few studies of the relation betwe...
This essay discredits current empirical models that are designed to “judge” or rank appellate judges...
This Article has a single objective: to dispel the notion that judges are deceptive or deluded about...
Can judges interpret the law in a manner that is objectively verifiable, or do judges necessarily – ...
This article critiques Professor Chris Guthrie\u27s lead symposium article entitled, Misjudging. G...
In Part I, I consider whether judges might hold inaccurate beliefs that make them more candid and co...
The study of judicial politics using empirical methods to gain insight into the process of judicial ...
Judging is difficult. This is obviously so in cases where the law is unclear or the facts are uncert...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The "balanced realist" view that judging inevit...
The institutional legitmacy of the judiciary depends on the quality of the judgments that judges mak...
Book review: Reflections on judging. By Richard A. Posner. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Pres...
Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies re...
What kinds of empirical questions about themselves and their colleagues on the bench are judges inte...
Unquestionably, judges misjudge. Even the most arrogant of judges ultimately will concede that all j...
How do judges judge? Do they apply law to facts in a mechanical and deliberative way, as the formali...
Perceptions of judges ought to be based on their performance. Yet, few studies of the relation betwe...
This essay discredits current empirical models that are designed to “judge” or rank appellate judges...
This Article has a single objective: to dispel the notion that judges are deceptive or deluded about...
Can judges interpret the law in a manner that is objectively verifiable, or do judges necessarily – ...
This article critiques Professor Chris Guthrie\u27s lead symposium article entitled, Misjudging. G...
In Part I, I consider whether judges might hold inaccurate beliefs that make them more candid and co...
The study of judicial politics using empirical methods to gain insight into the process of judicial ...
Judging is difficult. This is obviously so in cases where the law is unclear or the facts are uncert...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.The "balanced realist" view that judging inevit...
The institutional legitmacy of the judiciary depends on the quality of the judgments that judges mak...
Book review: Reflections on judging. By Richard A. Posner. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Pres...
Do judges make decisions that are truly impartial? A wide range of experimental and field studies re...
What kinds of empirical questions about themselves and their colleagues on the bench are judges inte...
Unquestionably, judges misjudge. Even the most arrogant of judges ultimately will concede that all j...
How do judges judge? Do they apply law to facts in a mechanical and deliberative way, as the formali...
Perceptions of judges ought to be based on their performance. Yet, few studies of the relation betwe...
This essay discredits current empirical models that are designed to “judge” or rank appellate judges...