For this third annual review of Supreme Court decisions, I have identified three cases from very different areas all of which involve the remedies available for violations of federal law. These cases deal with the following issues: (a) federal remedies for state violations of federal labor policy (Chamber of Commerce); (b) state remedies for violations of the federal Bill of Rights (Danforth) and (c) federal common law standards for awarding punitive damages (Exxon Shipping)
Legislation proposed in the 97th Congress seeking to limit federal court and Supreme Court jurisdict...
The first section of this Note examines and evaluates the mechanics of remittitur procedure in the f...
Preemption of common law remedies for individual injuries such as harm to health raises fundamental ...
For this third annual review of Supreme Court decisions, I have identified three cases from very dif...
According to the common law doctrine of ubi jus, ibi remedium, where there is a right, there is a re...
The American judicial system is founded on several policies which act as guideposts for the courts. ...
The Supreme Court has ushered in the new millennium with a renewed emphasis on federalism-based limi...
Every Term of the Supreme Court has a blockbuster case or two that come to represent snapshots of th...
The archetypal constitutional plaintiff represents a class, sues in federal court, and asks the cour...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2009–2010 Term ushered in both important federal law clarifications and div...
The power of the federal courts to remedy injuries caused by constitutional violations is a fundamen...
In a colloquium concentrating on the lower federal courts\u27 jurisdiction to determine federal clai...
In the fall of 1970, plaintiff Richard Steffel participated in the distribution of anti-war leaflets...
Following hard on the heels of two unanimous decisions sustaining the authority of state courts to e...
This symposium paper elaborates on two questions raised by the author’s prior work, Remedial Discret...
Legislation proposed in the 97th Congress seeking to limit federal court and Supreme Court jurisdict...
The first section of this Note examines and evaluates the mechanics of remittitur procedure in the f...
Preemption of common law remedies for individual injuries such as harm to health raises fundamental ...
For this third annual review of Supreme Court decisions, I have identified three cases from very dif...
According to the common law doctrine of ubi jus, ibi remedium, where there is a right, there is a re...
The American judicial system is founded on several policies which act as guideposts for the courts. ...
The Supreme Court has ushered in the new millennium with a renewed emphasis on federalism-based limi...
Every Term of the Supreme Court has a blockbuster case or two that come to represent snapshots of th...
The archetypal constitutional plaintiff represents a class, sues in federal court, and asks the cour...
The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2009–2010 Term ushered in both important federal law clarifications and div...
The power of the federal courts to remedy injuries caused by constitutional violations is a fundamen...
In a colloquium concentrating on the lower federal courts\u27 jurisdiction to determine federal clai...
In the fall of 1970, plaintiff Richard Steffel participated in the distribution of anti-war leaflets...
Following hard on the heels of two unanimous decisions sustaining the authority of state courts to e...
This symposium paper elaborates on two questions raised by the author’s prior work, Remedial Discret...
Legislation proposed in the 97th Congress seeking to limit federal court and Supreme Court jurisdict...
The first section of this Note examines and evaluates the mechanics of remittitur procedure in the f...
Preemption of common law remedies for individual injuries such as harm to health raises fundamental ...
Add to ORKG