In this article, the author focuses on the balancing of powers in an age of terror and discusses the effects of the war on terror, promoted by the U.S. It is stated that the war of terror had already caused many considerable problems for the constitutional balance of powers between the executive and legislative branches. It is mentioned that in an attempt to curb terrorism after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, the U.S. government tried to expand the executive powers
When drafting the Constitution, the Framers implemented a structural system of checks and balances t...
This article explores the proper role of judicial balancing in cases arising out of the war on terro...
External shocks to democratic systems are likely to threaten the stability of relations between the ...
The United States\u27 War on Terror lacks identifiable enemies and obvious front lines. It is fought...
Constitutions – codified or unwritten – institutionalise and actually constitute specific equilibria...
In democratic polities, constitutional equilibria or balances of power between the executive and the...
The 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington prompted a "global war on terror" that led to a signific...
The 9/11 attacks made the war on terror the central plank of American grand strategy. Yet despite it...
The article contextualizes the United States (US) counter-terrorism policies from 2001 to the presen...
Two important paradigm shifts have occurred in the war on terror. First, the United States has treat...
US presidents have expanded executive power in times of war and emergency,sometimes aggressively so....
The War on Terror has resulted in a significant prioritization of Executive power in order to combat...
Three years after an attack that traumatized the nation and prompted massive military and law-enforc...
Fifteen years after the September 11th terror attacks, the United States still exists in a state of ...
This article contrasts and compares the war on terror and the war of terror in the wake of, and befo...
When drafting the Constitution, the Framers implemented a structural system of checks and balances t...
This article explores the proper role of judicial balancing in cases arising out of the war on terro...
External shocks to democratic systems are likely to threaten the stability of relations between the ...
The United States\u27 War on Terror lacks identifiable enemies and obvious front lines. It is fought...
Constitutions – codified or unwritten – institutionalise and actually constitute specific equilibria...
In democratic polities, constitutional equilibria or balances of power between the executive and the...
The 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington prompted a "global war on terror" that led to a signific...
The 9/11 attacks made the war on terror the central plank of American grand strategy. Yet despite it...
The article contextualizes the United States (US) counter-terrorism policies from 2001 to the presen...
Two important paradigm shifts have occurred in the war on terror. First, the United States has treat...
US presidents have expanded executive power in times of war and emergency,sometimes aggressively so....
The War on Terror has resulted in a significant prioritization of Executive power in order to combat...
Three years after an attack that traumatized the nation and prompted massive military and law-enforc...
Fifteen years after the September 11th terror attacks, the United States still exists in a state of ...
This article contrasts and compares the war on terror and the war of terror in the wake of, and befo...
When drafting the Constitution, the Framers implemented a structural system of checks and balances t...
This article explores the proper role of judicial balancing in cases arising out of the war on terro...
External shocks to democratic systems are likely to threaten the stability of relations between the ...