How long has peer review been in crisis? At what point does crisis outlast emergency to become status quo? Attacks on the weaknesses of peer review appear with such regularity that they have migrated from scholarly journals to newspapers and magazines. Notwithstanding criticism—and bold experiments such as the experimental open peer review given online to Kathleen Fitzpatrick’s 2011 book Planned Obsolescence before its publication—the gears grind on, due in large part to the reward systems built around the mechanism of blind and anonymous review
In this paper, the author discusses whether open access threatens peer review, as implied by the Ass...
The use of independent peer reviewers, to obtain advice from experts knowledgeable in a particular r...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
How long has peer review been in crisis? At what point does crisis outlast emergency to become statu...
Do we still need peer review? An argument for change is a critical history of the journal peer revie...
The traditional thought regarding peer review tends to be that it started with the establishment of ...
Over the last several months, as I\u27ve met with the folks from if:book and with the quite impressi...
A paper examining changes in peer review practices, primarily with a humanities focu
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of wh...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
Prepublication peer review should be abolished. We consider the effects that such a change will have...
Journal editors have observed a greater occurrence of reviewers agreeing to peer review but never co...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
The journal publishing model has long been criticised for being out of touch with modern, online com...
In this paper, the author discusses whether open access threatens peer review, as implied by the Ass...
The use of independent peer reviewers, to obtain advice from experts knowledgeable in a particular r...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
How long has peer review been in crisis? At what point does crisis outlast emergency to become statu...
Do we still need peer review? An argument for change is a critical history of the journal peer revie...
The traditional thought regarding peer review tends to be that it started with the establishment of ...
Over the last several months, as I\u27ve met with the folks from if:book and with the quite impressi...
A paper examining changes in peer review practices, primarily with a humanities focu
Peer review is central to academic publishing. Yet for many it is a mysterious and contentious pract...
The peer review process is undergoing transformation; this raises a series of challenges, some of wh...
This editorial describes some of the current and emerging challenges in peer review for the academic...
Prepublication peer review should be abolished. We consider the effects that such a change will have...
Journal editors have observed a greater occurrence of reviewers agreeing to peer review but never co...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...
The journal publishing model has long been criticised for being out of touch with modern, online com...
In this paper, the author discusses whether open access threatens peer review, as implied by the Ass...
The use of independent peer reviewers, to obtain advice from experts knowledgeable in a particular r...
New models of scientific publishing and new ways of practicing peer review have injected a recent dy...