Policy decisions on endocrine disruptors should be based on science across disciplines: a response to Dietrich et al.
- Gore, A. C.
- Balthazart, J.
- Bikle, D.
- Carpenter, D. O.
- Crews, D.
- Czernichow, P.
- Diamanti-Kandarakis, E.
- Dores, R. M.
- Grattan, D.
- Hof, P. R.
- Hollenberg, A. N.
- Lange, C.
- Lee, A. V.
- Levine, J. E.
- Millar, R. P.
- Nelson, R. J.
- Porta, M.
- Poth, M.
- Power, Deborah
- Prins, G. S.
- Ridgway, E. C.
- Rissman, E. F.
- Romijn, J. A.
- Sawchenko, P. E.
- Sly, P. D.
- Söder, O.
- Taylor, H. S.
- Tena-Sempere, M.
- Vaudry, H.
- Wallen, K.
- Wang, Z.
- Wartofsky, L.
- Watson, C. S.
DOIAbstract
We are writing as scientists and editors of leading peer-reviewed journals that have published important contributions in the study of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). By signing this editorial, we affirm that regulatory decisions on EDCs should be made based on the best available science and expertise that involves, among others, reproductive biology, endocrinology, medicine, genetics, behavior, developmental biology, and toxicology (1). (For a complete list of Signatories and their Disclosures, see Supplemental Table 1 published on The Endocrine Society’s Journals Online web site at http://end.endojournals.org.)The following is the list of signatories. The complete list of their affiliations and disclosure information is provided i...
Add to ORKG