In this paper, we argue that on many important public policy questions, people may be unsure of their preferences because their underlying principles or values are in conflict. We build a simple model of conflicting core beliefs, building on the work of Heider (1958). Using abortion policies as our test case, we develop a test for our theory using heteroskedastic probit, using data taken from the 1988 General Social Survey. The heteroskedastic probit results confirm our model, and in the last section of the paper, we trace the implications of this model for some of the larger questions in public opinion research
The beliefs people hold about the social and physical world are central to self-definition and socia...
The conciliationist and steadfast approaches have dominated the conversation in the epistemology of ...
People seem more divided than ever before over social and political issues, entrenched in their exis...
In this paper, we argue that on many important public policy questions, people may be unsure of thei...
Few debates, political or academic, are as conflictual as those over racial policy. In this paper, w...
We propose a method for decomposing variation in the issue preferences that US citizens express on s...
Abstract: Recent research has recognized that many people simultaneously hold positive and negative ...
This paper develops a theory in which heterogeneity in political preferences produces a partisan dis...
We propose a method for decomposing variation in the issue preferences that US citizens express on s...
National survey data are used to examine the conflicting values that underly the mixed stance that t...
Most research in public opinion and political sophistication relies on the assumption that Americans...
People disagree about the empirical dimensions of various public policy issues. It\u27s not surprisi...
Most research on public opinion assumes that American political views are structured by a belief sys...
This dissertation examines the role of core values in American public opinion, utilizing the closed-...
Exploring the extent and nature of attitudinal ambivalence on public policy issues, these essays by ...
The beliefs people hold about the social and physical world are central to self-definition and socia...
The conciliationist and steadfast approaches have dominated the conversation in the epistemology of ...
People seem more divided than ever before over social and political issues, entrenched in their exis...
In this paper, we argue that on many important public policy questions, people may be unsure of thei...
Few debates, political or academic, are as conflictual as those over racial policy. In this paper, w...
We propose a method for decomposing variation in the issue preferences that US citizens express on s...
Abstract: Recent research has recognized that many people simultaneously hold positive and negative ...
This paper develops a theory in which heterogeneity in political preferences produces a partisan dis...
We propose a method for decomposing variation in the issue preferences that US citizens express on s...
National survey data are used to examine the conflicting values that underly the mixed stance that t...
Most research in public opinion and political sophistication relies on the assumption that Americans...
People disagree about the empirical dimensions of various public policy issues. It\u27s not surprisi...
Most research on public opinion assumes that American political views are structured by a belief sys...
This dissertation examines the role of core values in American public opinion, utilizing the closed-...
Exploring the extent and nature of attitudinal ambivalence on public policy issues, these essays by ...
The beliefs people hold about the social and physical world are central to self-definition and socia...
The conciliationist and steadfast approaches have dominated the conversation in the epistemology of ...
People seem more divided than ever before over social and political issues, entrenched in their exis...