This paper examines spatial equilibrium in political competition when established parties choose their platforms competitively while rationally anticipating entry of a vote-maximizing third party. The resulting equilibrium is substantially different from the Hotelling "median" equilibrium. Established parties are spatially separated and third parties will generally lose the election. This provides one theoretical explanation for the stability of two-party systems. Namely that non-cooperative behavior between established parties can effectively prevent third parties from winning
I first show that if there are more than two potential candidates in the Hotelling- Downs model of t...
We study a unidimensional model of spatial competition between two parties with endogeneous party me...
I first show that if there are more than two potential candidates in the Hotelling– Downs model of t...
This paper examines spatial equilibrium in political competition when established parties choose the...
This paper analyzes a spatial model of political competition between two policy- motivated parties i...
This paper uses the Hotelling-Downs spatial model of electoral competition between candidates to exp...
A spatial model of party competition is studied in which, (i) Parties are supposed to have ideology....
This paper studies the equilibria of a one-dimensional spatial model in which three candidates seek ...
In this paper we show that in a simple spatial model where the government is chosen under strict pro...
Two incumbent parties choose their platforms in a unidimensional policy space while facing a credibl...
We explore the dynamics of multiple competing political parties under spatial voting. Parties are al...
We use Hotelling’s spatial model of competition to investigate the position-taking behaviour of poli...
We analyze a one-dimensional model of spatial political competition with two parties and uncertainty...
We study a unidimensional model of spatial competition between two parties with two types of politic...
A one-dimensional model of spatial political competition with endogenous party formation is develope...
I first show that if there are more than two potential candidates in the Hotelling- Downs model of t...
We study a unidimensional model of spatial competition between two parties with endogeneous party me...
I first show that if there are more than two potential candidates in the Hotelling– Downs model of t...
This paper examines spatial equilibrium in political competition when established parties choose the...
This paper analyzes a spatial model of political competition between two policy- motivated parties i...
This paper uses the Hotelling-Downs spatial model of electoral competition between candidates to exp...
A spatial model of party competition is studied in which, (i) Parties are supposed to have ideology....
This paper studies the equilibria of a one-dimensional spatial model in which three candidates seek ...
In this paper we show that in a simple spatial model where the government is chosen under strict pro...
Two incumbent parties choose their platforms in a unidimensional policy space while facing a credibl...
We explore the dynamics of multiple competing political parties under spatial voting. Parties are al...
We use Hotelling’s spatial model of competition to investigate the position-taking behaviour of poli...
We analyze a one-dimensional model of spatial political competition with two parties and uncertainty...
We study a unidimensional model of spatial competition between two parties with two types of politic...
A one-dimensional model of spatial political competition with endogenous party formation is develope...
I first show that if there are more than two potential candidates in the Hotelling- Downs model of t...
We study a unidimensional model of spatial competition between two parties with endogeneous party me...
I first show that if there are more than two potential candidates in the Hotelling– Downs model of t...