Add to ORKGThe fine lunar surface material at the Surveyor 3 landing site has about 3 × 10^3-dyne/cm^2 cohesion, 35° angle of internal friction, 3 × 10^5-dyne/cm^2 static bearing capacity. A small rock withstood a local pressure of 2 × 10^7 dynes/cm^2. Soil strength and density increase significantly at depths of a few centimeters. Exposed surface has a considerably higher albedo than the material just below it. The photometric function changed when the surface was slightly compressed. Fine surface material appears to be gradually moving downslope
A lunar surface sampler essentially identical to that operated from Surveyor 3 was mounted on Survey...
During the sojourn of the second manned spacecraft on the moon in November 1969, the astronauts C. C...
A lunar surface sampler essentially identical to that operated from Surveyor 3 was mounted on Survey...
The fine lunar surface material at the Surveyor 3 landing site has about 3 × 10^3-dyne/cm^2 cohesion...
The surface material at the Surveyor 5 site is granular and slightly cohesive. Spacecraft footpads p...
The surface material at the Surveyor 5 site is granular and slightly cohesive. Spacecraft footpads p...
Engineering telemetry data and lunar surface photographs by Surveyor 1 have been evaluated for infor...
Engineering telemetry data and lunar surface photographs by Surveyor 1 have been evaluated for infor...
The mechanical properties of the lunar soil at the Surveyor V landing site seem to be generally cons...
The mechanical properties of the lunar soil at the Surveyor V landing site seem to be generally cons...
The Apollo lunar landing missions provided the first opportunity for direct collection of data rela...
After the success of Surveyor 1 in meeting the objectives of the engineering flight series, selectio...
After the success of Surveyor 1 in meeting the objectives of the engineering flight series, selectio...
The Apollo lunar landing missions provided the first opportunity for direct collection of data rela...
The soil mechanics investigation was conducted to obtain information relating to the landing interac...
A lunar surface sampler essentially identical to that operated from Surveyor 3 was mounted on Survey...
During the sojourn of the second manned spacecraft on the moon in November 1969, the astronauts C. C...
A lunar surface sampler essentially identical to that operated from Surveyor 3 was mounted on Survey...
The fine lunar surface material at the Surveyor 3 landing site has about 3 × 10^3-dyne/cm^2 cohesion...
The surface material at the Surveyor 5 site is granular and slightly cohesive. Spacecraft footpads p...
The surface material at the Surveyor 5 site is granular and slightly cohesive. Spacecraft footpads p...
Engineering telemetry data and lunar surface photographs by Surveyor 1 have been evaluated for infor...
Engineering telemetry data and lunar surface photographs by Surveyor 1 have been evaluated for infor...
The mechanical properties of the lunar soil at the Surveyor V landing site seem to be generally cons...
The mechanical properties of the lunar soil at the Surveyor V landing site seem to be generally cons...
The Apollo lunar landing missions provided the first opportunity for direct collection of data rela...
After the success of Surveyor 1 in meeting the objectives of the engineering flight series, selectio...
After the success of Surveyor 1 in meeting the objectives of the engineering flight series, selectio...
The Apollo lunar landing missions provided the first opportunity for direct collection of data rela...
The soil mechanics investigation was conducted to obtain information relating to the landing interac...
A lunar surface sampler essentially identical to that operated from Surveyor 3 was mounted on Survey...
During the sojourn of the second manned spacecraft on the moon in November 1969, the astronauts C. C...
A lunar surface sampler essentially identical to that operated from Surveyor 3 was mounted on Survey...