We examine the phenomenon of escalation from an economist’s perspective, emphasizing explanations which do not rule out rational behavior on the part of firms or agents. We argue that escalation cannot be established as a separate phenomenon unless these possible alternative explanations are properly accounted for. We present Staw and Hoang’s (1995) study of NBA data as an instance of where evidence of escalation might be overturned upon more careful analysis. After performing several tests of our alternative explanations, we find that evidence of escalation persists, although it is weaker both in duration and magnitude
a b s t r a c t Individuals often honor sunk costs by increasing their commitment to failing courses...
The escalation of commitment process involves a decision-maker continuing commitment to an investmen...
Escalation of commitment emerged as a major explanation for the propensity of management information...
We examine the phenomenon of escalation from an economist's perspective, emphasizing explanations wh...
The escalation of commitment to a particular course of action has, in the past eleven years, become ...
Traditional economic theory suggests that decision makers should not allow sunk costs to shape futur...
This study highlights competitive market conditions as an important structural deter-minant of escal...
Escalation of commitment and the sunk cost effect have often been erroneously used interchangeably. ...
Research indicates inappropriate escalation of commitment to apparently failing decisions occurs in ...
The phenomenon of "commitment escalation " originated from decision makers, and is part ne...
Escalation bias implies that managers favor reinvestments in projects that are doing poorly over tho...
Escalation of commitment describes the human trait to continue with a failing course of ac-tion, i. ...
Escalation of commitment to failing investments is considered to be representative of biased forms o...
Escalation of commitment to a failing course of action occurs in the presence of (a) sunk costs, (b)...
Economic rationality dictates that only incremental costs and benefits should affect decisions. Obse...
a b s t r a c t Individuals often honor sunk costs by increasing their commitment to failing courses...
The escalation of commitment process involves a decision-maker continuing commitment to an investmen...
Escalation of commitment emerged as a major explanation for the propensity of management information...
We examine the phenomenon of escalation from an economist's perspective, emphasizing explanations wh...
The escalation of commitment to a particular course of action has, in the past eleven years, become ...
Traditional economic theory suggests that decision makers should not allow sunk costs to shape futur...
This study highlights competitive market conditions as an important structural deter-minant of escal...
Escalation of commitment and the sunk cost effect have often been erroneously used interchangeably. ...
Research indicates inappropriate escalation of commitment to apparently failing decisions occurs in ...
The phenomenon of "commitment escalation " originated from decision makers, and is part ne...
Escalation bias implies that managers favor reinvestments in projects that are doing poorly over tho...
Escalation of commitment describes the human trait to continue with a failing course of ac-tion, i. ...
Escalation of commitment to failing investments is considered to be representative of biased forms o...
Escalation of commitment to a failing course of action occurs in the presence of (a) sunk costs, (b)...
Economic rationality dictates that only incremental costs and benefits should affect decisions. Obse...
a b s t r a c t Individuals often honor sunk costs by increasing their commitment to failing courses...
The escalation of commitment process involves a decision-maker continuing commitment to an investmen...
Escalation of commitment emerged as a major explanation for the propensity of management information...