Team incentives have been found to be particularly effective both in the lab and in the field despite the moral hazard in teams problem identified by Holmström (1982). In a newly developed virtual workplace, we show that, in line with Holmström, moral hazard in teams is indeed pervasive. Subsequently, we find strong evidence for the conjecture of Kandel and Lazear (1992) that peer pressure may resolve the moral hazard in teams problem. Organizations equipped with a very weak form of peer monitoring (anonymous and without physical proximity, verbal threats or face-to-face interactions) perform as well as those using individual incentives
We present results from a real-effort experiment, simulating actual work-place conditions, comparing...
Abstract: This paper estimates social effects of incentivizing people in teams. In three field exper...
Many organizations rely on teamwork, and yet field evidence on the impacts of team-based incentives ...
Holmström (1982) established that free riding behaviors are pervasive whenever people are paid accor...
It is often suggested that team spirit counteracts free-riding. Testing for team spirit with field d...
We study several solutions to shirking in teams that trigger social incentives by reshaping the work...
Many organizations rely on teamwork, and yet field evidence on the impacts of team-based incentives ...
The authors investigate the role of peer pressure in influencing the optimal incentive scheme offere...
This paper studies the effects of peer pressure on incentives. We assume that, in addition to the ma...
Peer effects arise in situations where workers observe each others’ work activity. In this paper, we...
Working Paper du GATE 2002-15Many empirical studies have shed light on the efficiency of peer pressu...
Monitoring by peers is often an effective means of attenuating incentive problems. Most explanations...
This paper studies incentives provision when agents are characterized either by homo moralis prefere...
This paper reports the results of an experiment on how team composition influences both the contract...
Teams are known to be more cognitively able, and accordingly behave more efficiently, than individua...
We present results from a real-effort experiment, simulating actual work-place conditions, comparing...
Abstract: This paper estimates social effects of incentivizing people in teams. In three field exper...
Many organizations rely on teamwork, and yet field evidence on the impacts of team-based incentives ...
Holmström (1982) established that free riding behaviors are pervasive whenever people are paid accor...
It is often suggested that team spirit counteracts free-riding. Testing for team spirit with field d...
We study several solutions to shirking in teams that trigger social incentives by reshaping the work...
Many organizations rely on teamwork, and yet field evidence on the impacts of team-based incentives ...
The authors investigate the role of peer pressure in influencing the optimal incentive scheme offere...
This paper studies the effects of peer pressure on incentives. We assume that, in addition to the ma...
Peer effects arise in situations where workers observe each others’ work activity. In this paper, we...
Working Paper du GATE 2002-15Many empirical studies have shed light on the efficiency of peer pressu...
Monitoring by peers is often an effective means of attenuating incentive problems. Most explanations...
This paper studies incentives provision when agents are characterized either by homo moralis prefere...
This paper reports the results of an experiment on how team composition influences both the contract...
Teams are known to be more cognitively able, and accordingly behave more efficiently, than individua...
We present results from a real-effort experiment, simulating actual work-place conditions, comparing...
Abstract: This paper estimates social effects of incentivizing people in teams. In three field exper...
Many organizations rely on teamwork, and yet field evidence on the impacts of team-based incentives ...