Add to ORKGThis article examines the Discretionary Persistent Felony Offender sentencing provision contained in New York Penal law section 70.10 and its vitality in the wake of Apprendi v. New Jersey. It examines the disparity in the controlling New York Court of Appeals cases and the holdings in Apprendi and its progeny. It also discusses ways in which the sentencing court can apply the sentnecing statute and avoid Apprendi pitfalls
This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say in...
This article traces the fascinating history of early efforts to identify defendants and their prior ...
This encyclopedia entry summarizes the pendulum-swings that led the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Every year hundreds of thousands of convicted criminal defendants are sentenced for their crimes, of...
Under Apprendi v. New Jersey, any fact that increases an offender\u27s maximum punishment must be fo...
The Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, ___ U.S. ___ (2000), held as a matter of due process that any f...
In its Apprendi line of cases, the Supreme Court has held that any fact found at sentencing (other t...
Part II of this Note sets forth the history behind the Apprendi decision, the Court\u27s rationale, ...
article published in law reviewThis article traces the fascinating history of early efforts to ident...
In June 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided Apprendi v. New Jersey,\u27 a case that likely...
The desirability and constitutionality of discretionary criminal sentencing can be ascertained only ...
This article argues that Blakely v. Washington did not decide (explicitly or implicitly) whether the...
This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’...
Compared to the previous two years, the Eleventh Circuit issued relatively few published opinions re...
This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say in...
This article traces the fascinating history of early efforts to identify defendants and their prior ...
This encyclopedia entry summarizes the pendulum-swings that led the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New...
Article published in the Michigan State University School of Law Student Scholarship Collection
Every year hundreds of thousands of convicted criminal defendants are sentenced for their crimes, of...
Under Apprendi v. New Jersey, any fact that increases an offender\u27s maximum punishment must be fo...
The Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey, ___ U.S. ___ (2000), held as a matter of due process that any f...
In its Apprendi line of cases, the Supreme Court has held that any fact found at sentencing (other t...
Part II of this Note sets forth the history behind the Apprendi decision, the Court\u27s rationale, ...
article published in law reviewThis article traces the fascinating history of early efforts to ident...
In June 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided Apprendi v. New Jersey,\u27 a case that likely...
The desirability and constitutionality of discretionary criminal sentencing can be ascertained only ...
This article argues that Blakely v. Washington did not decide (explicitly or implicitly) whether the...
This article addresses the impact of Alleyne v. United States on statutes that restrict an offender’...
Compared to the previous two years, the Eleventh Circuit issued relatively few published opinions re...
This essay offers a menu of procedural alternatives for coping with the potential, some would say in...
This article traces the fascinating history of early efforts to identify defendants and their prior ...
This encyclopedia entry summarizes the pendulum-swings that led the Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New...