The major thesis of this Dissertation is that (1) causal and historical explanation theories are fundamentally similar to Russell\u27s about proper names and definite descriptions, and (2) the main antagonist of the recent theorists is Quine, not Russell. These recent theorists include Kripk
Stephen Stich (hereafter, MMNS) argue that recent experiments concerning reference undermine various...
What is the relationship between Russell's conception of philosophy and that of the author of the Tr...
This paper is an attempt to present a Kripkean (Causal) picture of Reference where the cognitive con...
Traditional descriptivism and Kripkean causalism are standardly interpreted as rival theories on a s...
Includes bibliographical references (page 32)In this paper I examine Bertrand Russell's theory or de...
Traditional descriptivism and Kripkean causalism are standardly interpreted as rival theories on a s...
In his influential paper 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', Kripke defends Russell's theo...
A response to Graham Stevens’s response to Lugg, ‘Russell as a Precursor of Quine’ (Bertrand Russell...
Together with an basic assumption of the main thesis of the theory of singular direct reference, thi...
THESIS 7992In the philosophical literature of the past century few if any philosophers present a gre...
The aim of this thesis is to put in both historical and logical perspective certain features of curr...
Philosophers have been referring to the “Kripke–Putnam ” theory of natural-kind terms for over 30 ye...
The paper seeks to show that Quine’s theses concerning the underdetermination of scientific theories...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
Stephen Stich (hereafter, MMNS) argue that recent experiments concerning reference undermine various...
What is the relationship between Russell's conception of philosophy and that of the author of the Tr...
This paper is an attempt to present a Kripkean (Causal) picture of Reference where the cognitive con...
Traditional descriptivism and Kripkean causalism are standardly interpreted as rival theories on a s...
Includes bibliographical references (page 32)In this paper I examine Bertrand Russell's theory or de...
Traditional descriptivism and Kripkean causalism are standardly interpreted as rival theories on a s...
In his influential paper 'Speaker's Reference and Semantic Reference', Kripke defends Russell's theo...
A response to Graham Stevens’s response to Lugg, ‘Russell as a Precursor of Quine’ (Bertrand Russell...
Together with an basic assumption of the main thesis of the theory of singular direct reference, thi...
THESIS 7992In the philosophical literature of the past century few if any philosophers present a gre...
The aim of this thesis is to put in both historical and logical perspective certain features of curr...
Philosophers have been referring to the “Kripke–Putnam ” theory of natural-kind terms for over 30 ye...
The paper seeks to show that Quine’s theses concerning the underdetermination of scientific theories...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
Around 1970, both Keith Donnellan and Saul Kripke produced powerful arguments against description th...
Stephen Stich (hereafter, MMNS) argue that recent experiments concerning reference undermine various...
What is the relationship between Russell's conception of philosophy and that of the author of the Tr...
This paper is an attempt to present a Kripkean (Causal) picture of Reference where the cognitive con...